Objection

OK, you're right about this specific thing, but I'm right about every other thing no debate no takebacks times infinity. That's how it works, right?

No, you're wrong.

You're welcome! Not sure what about it is ironic but I'm glad you enjoyed it so much!

So if I don't vote for Kamala, I'm voting for Trump. But hold on - by not voting for Trump, that's also a vote for Kamala! But I'm also voting for the person I actually voted for. Am I casting votes for three different candidates?

The way votes work is that they tally up all the people who actually voted for a candidate, and that number is higher than the people who actually voted for any particular other candidate, then that candidate wins. Third party votes do not get added to either candidate's vote total. So not voting for one is not an assist for the other. Period. End of story. Case Closed. No more debate about it.

I don't see how my internet addiction has anything to do with the fact that y'all possess complete ignorance of basic ethics while accusing everyone you disagree with of the same.

Ah yes, the first day in ethics they tell you how the Trolley Problem famously has one objective answer that everyone agrees with. You have clearly, definitely attended an ethics class.

Dunning-Kruger in full effect here.

I understand already. The problem is that none of you understand or have any interest in engaging with what third party voters actually believe or why we reject your arguments, you just want to repeat the same BS over and over in hopes that we fall in line.

The only people who are helping Trump are Trump voters, because that's how votes work.