Who's that?
OKRainbowKid
joined 2 years ago
Does knowingly causing an ecological catastrophe qualify as an act of war? To me, that seems worse than blockading these specific ships.
Nun war Scholz aber in China, und deswegen geht's in diesem Post eben auch um China. Das China sich als Hegemonialmacht etablieren möchte und mehr und mehr auf Konfrontation mit seinen Nachbarn geht, ist schwer zu leugnen.
"China verfolgt [...] eine hegemoniale Strategie." ist für dich keine Kritik an China? Für mich ist "hegemonial" eindeutig negativ konnotiert.
I don't think you're missing anything. Just maybe you're taking his tweet more serious or literal than he intended. To me, it's just an interesting perspective to consider tweets that are meant to influence your opinion as malware. Sure, somebody aware of the types of "bad input" in the form of misinformation campaigns, propaganda or advertisement might not be (as) susceptible to that - but considering the average Twitter user, comparing this type of content to malware seems appropriate to me.
No, that is 100% whataboutism. It's an attempt to deflect the discussion from the topic at hand. If you want to have a discussion about THING_THAT_YOU_CONSIDER_BAD_AND_ALSO_TRUE, you can make a new post just for that.
I see where you're coming from, but if you look up Karpathy, you'll probably come to a different conclusion.
Can you tankies find some new strategy?
Whataboutism and deflection is getting really boring.
Doing a thorough job risks the sensational headlines though.
Wat