I'm voting FOR. To be honest, after reading the comments, I do find the argument convincing that we shouldn't enable the illusion of security. But, on the other hand, I strongly believe that creating a tool to specifically investigate particular individuals, even if it was already technically possible, is ripe for abuse.
Literally any barrier to entry can give some angry individual a chance to cool down before they go on a brigade against the target of their rage. I'd slightly prefer if we don't enable them.
All that said, if it's not this tool it will probably be another, so my vote is mostly symbolic.
I mean, maybe, I really can't say for sure. Taking this to its logical extreme - should everyone have access to Clearview or one of the many facial recognition databases? There are clear upsides and stark downsides.
Obviously this case is a lot less everything than that hypothetical, but I think it's all part of a larger conversation about privacy and access to ostensibly private information, or even how private information should be.
I'm not prepared to believe that humanity is ready for all the privacy we've enjoyed to be lost so quickly.