Ah ah - right, I failed to recognize that the suit in question was a civil suit seeking damages for battery.
Still, my original statement is true: not 'guilty' in a legal sense (I added quotes here for clarity). 'Guilty' implies a criminal trial, which that one was not.
Not guilty in the legal sense, but it was a finding of fact that sealed his liability for defamation.
Or, as my dad told me, "There's the right way, and the right now way."
Explanation: Many early aviators died in crashes. However, many early aviators also survived numerous ~~crashes~~ acceptable landings and just went on to keep on flying.
Bipedal sheep.
That is the face of your self-loathing, pleased to be loathing you.
That appears to be one or two resorts of some kind, any idea what they were?
That's Delaware, for the uninitiated. The tax thing is because there's some lady's house in Delaware that's registered as the headquarters for about a zillion shell companies as a tax dodge, because of something something Delaware business taxes.
This is kind of similar to how it is in the US these days, too. There are still banks that have tellers, especially for drive through, since we love our cars, but far fewer. And I have been to banks here where there are no proper tellers.
Even in that case, the person who is helping you behind the counter is still an employee, drawing a salary (maybe plus commission, for things like loans, accounts, whatever). They're still labor, they're still having their labor undercompensated, they're still victims of theft.
The legal system is all about hair-splitting.
In court, he was found liable for sexual abuse. Colloquially and in reality, he is guilty of rape. It is important not to conflate the two.