"The no has it" are you fucking kidding me.
Poe's Law
I just fixed one of my motorcycles, and I'm currently doing a deep dive on the pros and cons of phenolic caliper pistons. I could go on about motorcycling and vehicle mechanics all day every day.
Thank you! That’s exactly what I wanted to hear!
Of course they don’t care if their users get scammed. They are also scamming them.
We’re in a pre-truth era. Always have been.
WSJ: "Oh, you're suing us? LFG."
He's still president. Even if he wasn't, his sycophants are waiting in the wings to carry on. What people think doesn't matter until and unless there's open revolt because of it.
That's great! Doesn't matter, but it's great!
... since most employers don't want to foot the bill for actual due diligence ...
Employers in the US can be liable for damages if they communicate inaccurate information about a former (or current, I imagine) employee's performance if that communication negatively affects the former employee's hirability.
Unless your former employer has detailed and contemporaneous records of your work history and reason for termination, and they're willing to risk being taken to court over telling those to your potential future employer, they're going to confirm hire and term dates, and nothing more. Everywhere I've ever worked has been like that; "If someone calls to check on employment history, you tell them hire/term dates and nothing more."
Your link has a trailing ) that makes it not work.
Fixed: https://lemmy.ca/pictrs/image/dd84fb3c-163d-4957-a68e-d03a91638a07.png