Strangely enough, for me, no - though it took a loooong time and a proper urologist to figure it out.
I can tell you what happens when you have blood in your urine, if you think you’re ready to hear it.
Don’t get me wrong, that was a decision made by the local store owner(s), not corporate, but still. I don’t think the store I was driving for just so happened to be the only one that did that.
Relevant username.
poorn
Joke’s on you; I’m into that shit.
The legal system is all about hair-splitting.
He was literally proven in court guilty of rape, in the defamation case.
In court, he was found liable for sexual abuse. Colloquially and in reality, he is guilty of rape. It is important not to conflate the two.
Ah ah - right, I failed to recognize that the suit in question was a civil suit seeking damages for battery.
Still, my original statement is true: not 'guilty' in a legal sense (I added quotes here for clarity). 'Guilty' implies a criminal trial, which that one was not.
Not guilty in the legal sense, but it was a finding of fact that sealed his liability for defamation.
The mobile app for mbin is a browser