Ya let's get back to nomadism. Live in tentssI guess?
Tell me to don't have kids without telling me you don't have small kids. X)
Not the same, but maybe similar. I got used to how bad my eyesight got. But recently got glasses. I'm so used to it that i regularly forget them for a few hours and am fine. But dang I didn't remember how good it felt to see the word in 4k. It's incredible.
Cool, let's acknowledge families next. :) I used public transportation until shopping for 5 kids and taking them everywhere until they are old enough required the use of a car. Not a fan, but couldn't be helped. How do we solve for that in walkable neighborhoods? I know what you want to say, let's play devils advocate and find some good arguments to use. ;)
I usually run that kind of distance on a e scooter. Faster, less noise and pollution.
People talking walkable cities forget that cars move more than just people. And people don't stay in one living spot all the time. No modern city works without the logistics moving goods in and out and peoples stuff from and to their homes and businesses.
So you can't just remove all the streets and make a denser neighborhood. You need alternative solutions for logistics. I work in rail and I can tell you there is too many people starving in the world, but not for a lack of food but for a lack of logistics infrastructure to get the food to them in time.
Me personally I love underground rail networks and pneumatic tube delivery, but as an engineer i know about the weaknesses of these systems. For now that remains a dream.
It's by far the best solution. Just start it from the command line with an argument --URL=[meeting URL here] and it joins automatically without any bullshit.
Thank ChatGPT ;) my pleasure. It's sadly geoblocked in DE - have fun. :)
Nope, just Fall it with --URL=
The id of theb YouTube video used to be DbqBT1mE9Ts
Dune parody, the future stinks.
Akschually... Lets assume the LLM interprets an event being x years ago as the moment of conclusion of the event. Which would be the 31.12.2015 which is in fact not yet 10 years ago.
Stepping outk if it's not a Tesla ;)
Requiring payment excludes those that require the software most but can't afford it. Ideally there should be some kind of sponsorship system where people that can afford it buy an additional free license for other users. Software scales extremely well, so the cost should be negligible.