NightOwl

joined 2 years ago
[–] NightOwl@lemmy.ca -5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Why do we need to "practice" in the South China Sea? How would we react if another country sailed their military up to the coast of BC?

 

The CAF deployed 600 personnel, a warship, a maritime helicopter, and three warplanes to Australia on July 13 to participate in the Talisman Sabre war exercise, which will run until August 4. Talisman Sabre is a biennial, massive-scale joint military exercise seemingly designed to flex member countries’ military might against superpowers like the PRC as global tensions rise. Australia and the US have been running the Talisman Sabre exercise every other year since 2005, but this year’s is set to be the largest yet – representing a grand total of 19 countries and 35,000 personnel, running from July 13 to August 4.

Such large-scale military operations as those on display under Talisman Sabre would constitute a gross and wholly avoidable escalation of current tensions in the South China Sea, as former Australian Ambassador to the Philippines and to South Korea, Mack Williams, wrote in 2017. The US' FONOP program in the South China Sea has been systematically proven ineffective and even counter-productive, serving only to provoke Chinese hostility, precluding diplomatic engagement.

[–] NightOwl@lemmy.ca 3 points 4 months ago

Un Bits de Tim as they say in Quebec

[–] NightOwl@lemmy.ca 4 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)
[–] NightOwl@lemmy.ca 2 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

There's a number of good ones in this thread.

[–] NightOwl@lemmy.ca 16 points 11 months ago

This seems to be the actual indictment, in case anyone wants to read it:

https://www.justice.gov/d9/2024-09/u.s._v._kalashnikov_and_afanasyeva_indictment_0.pdf

[–] NightOwl@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The Carter Center (cited by that BBC piece) is funded by various western governments including the US, as well as CIA-affiliated regime-change orgs like the National Endowment for Democracy. They are not a neutral party.

The "pro-Kremlin" smear is similarly questionable as it is promoted by the same groups.

[–] NightOwl@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Are there any problems with this particular story? I found it to be mostly collating current thought about BCI and its applications.

[–] NightOwl@lemmy.ca 11 points 2 years ago (5 children)
[–] NightOwl@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)
[–] NightOwl@lemmy.ca 0 points 2 years ago (2 children)

This article is literally quoting the official press release of the committee's chairman:

https://oversight.house.gov/release/wenstrup-releases-statement-following-dr-faucis-two-day-testimony/

Dr. Fauci claimed that the “6 feet apart” social distancing recommendation promoted by federal health officials was likely not based on any data. He characterized the development of the guidance by stating “it sort of just appeared.”

Dr. Fauci acknowledged that the lab leak hypothesis is not a conspiracy theory.

Dr. Fauci admitted that America’s vaccine mandates during the COVID-19 pandemic could increase vaccine hesitancy in the future.

view more: next ›