It's not the woman it's the police officer/department that would agree. So, if there is language saying the user knows and understands that the system is not accurate then it becomes harder to go after the developer.
Newsteinleo
joined 1 year ago
Robert Picardo even says this
There are 4 things that need to be true for a defamation case. The statement must be false. The statement must be presented in away a reasonable person would believe it. The statement must be published for at least one other person to see. The statement must cause harm
The hardest part will be the second condition. The software publisher probably has all kinds of disclaimers in their EULA to cover this one. It also depends on how the software presents the information to the user.
I am sure they are also seeing a growing demand for more privacy, the only reason own a pixel is because of GrapheneOS. If I could buy a phone with the OS pre installed I would, don't know if they are going to do that. Also, by patterning with GrapheneOS they don't has the development cost and they can trade on Graphenes name
They exist in the US you don't hear about them because those leaders don't make good headlines.
Another Eagle jumping in. It is so clear these clowns know nothing of what scouting is about.
Janeway advocated her crew members that could not advocate for themselves
You still have trace each cable between the patch panel and the switch or thing could end up on the wrong subnet.
God forbid you have to swap out a cable or a port does on the switch. You will spend 20 min trying to figure out what cable goes where
This is a great game if you like story focused games.
If I was the architect of the system that is how I would do it. However a high enough score could still be sufficient in this case. The system made an assertion that lead to damages even if the assertion was 60% match.