The only accountability for a niche forum somebody else runs elsewhere is that you tell people how they suck and to not go there. You can't send the cops on them like how you could call them on a coffee shop where they're doing illegal discrimination.
If other people agree they suck they'll block that community and leave for another that's better run.
Better discovery of related communities, including everything from cross-endorsement from mods, to public user lists of communities, to lemmy instance admin recommended communities (kinda like old reddit default subs, per instance), to fediverse reputation mechanisms, etc.
Also better UX, like lemmy clients with "multireddit" style browsing support.
When interacting with individual lemmy communities, we need better introductions and exposure to rules and guidelines while posting.
Individual communities and instances should be able to run themselves however they want. The lemmy network will be healthiest when people know what to expect and where to find what they want. And if you don't find a place, it should be easier to create and advertise it.
And lastly: community coaching where experienced mods teach new ones.
The one that survived without needing to be shut off essentially serves as proof of viability, and combined with the data from the ones that was repaired it helps them figure out how to adjust the design and manufacturing to make every unit last longer. Basically, future turbines should be cheaper to run.
Posted there now
I have alts. No automatic sync, but you can list your alts in your profile like I do.
On mobile make sure to use a client which makes it easy to switch between accounts (I use Thunder, which additionally shows server status in the account switcher!)
Nice to see the status lights back on green!
[Windows subsystem] for [executable environment] is the naming scheme. The default is Win32, there's one for POSIX (practically never used), and Linux runs in another.
EBU insisted it would be political to kick out Israel but said no such thing about kicking out Russia
But the more practical reason: a bunch of member states threatened leaving over Russia's participation and haven't done so over Israel
Malicious compliance is when you follow a order or law knowing that it will backfire on those who issued it.
"Lawfare" is a comparable term but not quite it (basically legal harassment campaigns).
This affects the view of posts via the bluesky servers, but not via mirrors or other servers
And the use of content addressing means you can be sure it hasn't been modified
As a moderator of computer security forums (cryptography specifically) who deal with both cranks and aggressive spammers - you just can't do without bans.
The only long term solution is to ensure there's always more than one community with separate leadership, so there's accountability for mods through pressure from the users. The threat to leave must feel credible.