Natanael

joined 1 year ago
[–] Natanael 2 points 2 months ago

They went for the protocol used by Bluesky. But apparently disabling federation.

[–] Natanael 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

What about surrealists

[–] Natanael 4 points 2 months ago

Interestingly they're basing it off the Bluesky atproto architecture. Seems like they're keeping controlled sign-ups and setting the appview to only index (and only display) their own users.

And if they don't break protocol compatibility, others could have a "read-only view" of their network from servers / clients that federate (comparable to a lemmy server which would reject incoming messages but still let you browse)

[–] Natanael 4 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

That meeting should've been an email anyway.

... Uh, wait a minute...

[–] Natanael 4 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Replying with this in a thread about fighting nazis is pretty tone deaf. Nazis never looted and terrorized anybody according to you...?

[–] Natanael 4 points 2 months ago

Not with those diets

Make Nazis Ballasts

[–] Natanael 2 points 2 months ago

It's worse than your typical creative claim on copyright of something like a poem - because prompts are by definition functional more than creative, and typically contain too few purely expressive elements to meet creative height. They managed to put prompts in a worse position than boilerplate code in terms of protection, lol

[–] Natanael 3 points 2 months ago

Exactly. At best you're commissioning work to a machine. You didn't provide much creativity, at best a direction and some constraints.

In the art world it's been settled ages ago that the underlying concept isn't protected, and few if any prompts go beyond just describing a vague concept.

[–] Natanael 21 points 2 months ago

A board of peace - after telling the Norwegian prime minister that he's not committed to peace anymore because he didn't get the peace price (and no, the PM doesn't control the peace price)

[–] Natanael 0 points 2 months ago

Every time the policies and suggestions and everything else was presented without names, Kamala's campaign won. When people didn't know who's proposal they was listening to, Kamala won.

So please explain what you mean about better candidate, because you have said nothing about how she was worse.

From here in Sweden, it looks like the things needing replacement is the fucking electorate and the billionaires owning the media companies

[–] Natanael 1 points 2 months ago

What part of the campaign was worse

Please specify

[–] Natanael 0 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Did you not pay attention to how Kamala was called a liar by media for saying Trump would send the military against cities?

... And then he did?

Did you not pay attention to how he claimed credit for Covid funds that Democrats established? Blaming Democrats for Trump judges' decisions? Setting up Afghanistan so the exit would happen at the start of Biden's turn to hurt his approval when it predictably turns to chaos? How Biden's age was somehow a problem but Trump's never was?

Media was hysterical about how democrats would make everything worse somehow but never explaining it, then repeating Trump's claims that he's deliver the best economy ever and all kinds of bullshit like it.

And with all that Trump still didn't even get 50%!

0
🕵️‍♂️ (infosec.pub)
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by Natanael to c/crypto
 
33
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by Natanael to c/crypto
 

Via; https://bsky.app/profile/nicksullivan.org/post/3ll7galasrc2z

CFRG process documentation has been updated.

10
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by Natanael to c/crypto
2
How to Hold KEMs (durumcrustulum.com)
submitted 1 year ago by Natanael to c/crypto
 

From: https://mastodon.social/@fj/114171907451597856

Interesting paper co-authored by Airbus cryptographer Erik-Oliver Blass on using zero-knowledge proofs in flight control systems.

Sensors would authenticate their measurements, the control unit provides in each iteration control outputs together with a proof of output correctness (reducing the need in some cases for redundant computations), and actuators verify that outputs have been correctly computed

4
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by Natanael to c/crypto
 

"The GSM Association announced that the latest RCS standard includes E2EE based on the Messaging Layer Security (MLS) protocol, enabling interoperable encryption between different platform providers for the first time"

 

HQC gets standardized, as an addition to ML-KEM (kyber). McEliece is out of the NIST process for two reasons, they consider it unlikely to be widely used, also ISO is considering standardizing it and they don't want to create an incompatible standard. If ISO does standardize it and it does see use, NIST is considering mirroring that standard (since lots of US agencies are bound to using NIST standards)

view more: ‹ prev next ›