I'm sorry, what exactly do you think this conversation is about if not using AI for code generation?
No, I want worker protections, regulatory enforcement, and broad public distrust of the exploitative owner class who are using AI to extract more wealth while destroying the environment we all live in.
Patronizing "AI" systems is collaboration with the worst garbage of the human race, the robber barons who are comfortable killing people for quarterly profits.
People like Peter Theil, Elon Musk and Sam Altman.
So don't accept code that is shit. Have decent PR process. Accountability is still on human.
If this is necessary then there is, in point of fact, a "problem in keeping code quality while using AI".
Every person in every industry in a rush to replace the work of creative people with output from machine learning models can fuck right off.
Every consumer who is content with products made by such people can also fuck right off.
there is no problem in keeping code quality while using AI
This opinion is contradicted by basically everyone who has attempted to use models to generate useful code which must interface with existing codebases. There are always quality issues, it must always be reviewed for functional errors, it rarely interoperates with existing code correctly, and it might just delete your production database no matter how careful you try to be.
You're right, there's a lot more delusional people with money riding on this line going up.
> Clemontine
Bro, just 10 million more dollars bro and my stochastic parrot will definitely be conscious... bro I only need a billion more and my AI will be intelligent... bro just a trillion more dollars bro...
If you want your tea to actually be drinkable and not taste like just bitter water, you don't use boiling water. A proper electric kettle allows you to set the water temperature to 85, 90 or 95°C.
Bookmarks are where projects go to die.