but how else will we track where everyone is all the time
You will use AI and you will ~~like it~~ have no recourse.
Ah yes, cultists are easier because you already know they're gullible.
Um, this is the point of going on a date? To get to know someone new? She shouldn't need anything else to go on until after they've spent some time getting to know each other? A first date is not a lifetime commitment.
How else do you get a date with someone, if not by asking them?
OK, sure, but again the claim was:
there is no problem in keeping code quality while using AI
Whether or not human-written code also requires review is outside the context of this discussion, and entirely irrelevant.
OK, sure, but again the claim was:
there is no problem in keeping code quality while using AI
Whether or not human-written code also requires review is outside the context of this discussion, and entirely irrelevant.
Oh, it's not, the difference is that the SVG is an unexpected delivery vector.
The script on a website might change over time, might be blocked by an extension like uBlock origin that prevents sections of web code from loading in the first place. You can block a website's JS with an extension that specifically does that, like jshelter. A malicious SVG is static, the malicious code is malicious forever and is embedded in the file. A browser extension can't selectively block pieces of the file from loading.
Script blocking extensions prevent web page code from loading, but they don't prevent the application from executing JS. If you open an SVG, the file is downloaded locally (it's not web code) and the JS in the file will execute locally, with the same permissions and file system access as the user opening the file.
Yup.
There's always value in understanding risk, and in limiting it.
the security risks associated with JavaScript are not typically seen as significant since your filesystem is not accessible and most any other vulnerable data isn't either for that matter
go on mate, pull the other one!
Rowhammer is unfixable, by the way, until someone invents a replacement for DRAM.
YSK: SVG files are a security risk. Be careful where you get them from and how you handle them.
Basically, an SVG can contain JavaScript. If you open an SVG in an application that can interpret the JS (e.g. a web browser) then the script will execute (just as with a malicious PDF), at which point it could download other files (malware) or perform any other function that the application has access to (creating, editing or deleting files on the hard drive) because you gave it permission to do that by opening the SVG. Effectively opening an SVG in a JS-capable application is the same as allowing a stranger to run arbitrary code on your computer. You might as well go around the Internet wearing a "please hack me" sign.
Downloading an SVG to your hard drive directly should be relatively safe, and opening it in a graphics program that does not execute JavaScript should have no risk, but viewing random SVGs in a web browser is a real hazard.
I suspect this is what the payment requirement is really about. Like, yes they're getting money, but they're also getting a credit card transaction at the gate at the date and time of travel.
It's always possible that someone else purchased your travel ticket for you (for instance I sometimes travel for work which my employer's travel agency books for me). But if you have to pay at the moment when your ID would be checked, presumably that has to be your personal card that you have on you in the moment.