MystikIncarnate

joined 2 years ago
[–] MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca 2 points 7 months ago (4 children)

The abstraction of thought is an interesting consideration, one I've done some research into. Our mind is the only known thing which has named itself.

With that being said, I think you would enjoy "thinking fast and slow" (it's a book). In that book he goes into detail about fast thinking which is heuristical and what we refer to as "muscle memory", "habit", or "doing without thinking". The interesting assertion he made about this "system 1" as he calls it, is that it lacks any ability to consider a statement as false. Every statement that goes into system 1, is considered to be true unless otherwise determined. System 2, or slow thinking, is more sapient and contemplative. This is what we would think is "us" as an abstract concept. Almost all of the information that goes into system 2 is filtered by system 1, so unless we reevaluate more carefully directing system 1 to examine everything, we are working off of incomplete data. Only what system 1 believes is relevant for the circumstances for system 2 to know. The rest is filtered out (to varying extents, depending on what executive function you have) as unnecessary. Things like background noises, other people speaking to eachother, signs, text, and other visual markers that are not important to what we're currently doing (and have not historically been important). System 1 just discards that data constantly.

I would say that universally, we all use the faculties of system 1 quite extensively, but we are largely unaware of it... We operate on "autopilot" more or less. There's a nontrivial number of people who seem to actively refuse to engage system 2, and do any cognitive and logical thinking. When they must, they do the bare minimum, and often opt to follow whatever tribe they identify as a part of. Whether that tribe is a sports team, a country, a political system or politician, or it's a religion or something. They turn to those people whom they trust (for better or worse) to make the best decision for them, and tell them what to think. This is especially bad because often, those people are making selfish choices. They're directing people to achieve an objective that benefits them directly, often at the expense of those who are following along.

This whole thing has more or less been beaten into us, both by family, friends, and communities, but also ingrained into us as a survival trait from when we hunted and gathered primarily. Where the survival of the tribe was the most important thing, at the cost of all other tribes and people and creatures.

We no longer need that survival trait of going along with whatever tribe we were born into, but it's not one we can easily disregard, since it's been ingrained in our cultural persona since we started walking around, many millennia ago.

There's still plenty of people walking up to the fact that they don't need to follow along to what others want of you, or do as they tell you to do. Getting away from the strong tribalism that is now mostly just a plague on humanity.

The problem is that the thinkers are independent, and neither want to follow, nor lead.

So here we are. Trajectory set to failure. Following these tribal leaders serving their own interests above all others. Removing one tribal leader just creates a part vacuum where another will step in to take their place, someone who is just as bad or worse with few exceptions.

[–] MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca 1 points 7 months ago (6 children)

I think I'm like 90% the way there already, I dealt with it by simply giving up on humanity.

I see everyone who is working class as essentially slave labor with extra steps. You get the "freedom" to live how you want, as long as you are working to earn a living because you're not worthy of being alive if you aren't helping someone pursue their capitalistic dreams. You're also "free" to choose where you want to live, because every square inch of the planet is "owned" by someone (with few exceptions), and you'll either end up having to pay someone to buy land to live on, or pay someone with land every month indefinitely to use their land to live.

Comparing today's working conditions to slavery: slaves are frequently provided food and shelter. They're also frequently provided medical care (though, there's a limit where you're not worth keeping alive). Everything is provided for you by the master. You're not paid, but you also don't need money to continue to live. In modern times you "choose" your job from an array of equally bad options, all of which barely pay you enough to buy food, and afford rent, and often, they pay less than a living wage, so you need to pool how much you make with others too have a place to stay. You don't get to rise up or progress to a more prestigious position in society, you're at the bottom and that's where you will stay. Except for you being given enough means to provide for yourself the same things you would be provided for free as a slave, there's little difference between the two.

The most notable difference is that you can't whip employees. There's no lashings for stepping out of line. Though, we could draw correlations between lashings and what happens in prison, but I digress.

Economically, most of society might actually be better off with working for room and board, since then they don't need to worry about how to pay the bills, that's all taken care of for them.

The choices we have available to us as the writing class are a farce to convince those that cannot see the bigger picture, into believing they are free. The educational system has been eroded and dumbed down enough that the vast majority of people fit the criteria of just smart enough to do the work, but not smart enough to question it, or anything else.

[–] MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca 13 points 7 months ago (1 children)

As soon as I read it, I thought, who are they protecting. Surely it's not difficult to find whoever created fastAPI.

Took less than a minute with a single word query on my search engine of choice.

I just don't understand the internet sometimes.

[–] MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca 8 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Never forget, there's some good fishin' in Quebec.

I'll see you around bud. I'm going for a rip.

[–] MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca 6 points 7 months ago (9 children)

I don't get the whole car being someone's identity thing. Whether it's their whole identity or just a part of it, doesn't matter.

A vehicle is a tool to get things done. Transporting people and things from location to location. But so many people are making it into a statement. I have no idea why.

I never wanted my car to make any statements, nor stand out in any way whatsoever. The reason of simple: no matter who you are, what you value, what you believe, there's always going to be people that disagree with you. A nontrivial number of those that disagree with your viewpoint, have the aptitude and willingness to mess with your property, especially when you're not looking.

So you're going to leave your opinion, on one of the most expensive things you own, while it is parked in public spaces with (more often than not) zero security against people's access to your shit.

I just.... I don't get it.

[–] MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

The difference is respect.

I can disagree with you but still respect that your decision is yours to make. In spite of any moral arguments, if it's not illegal I don't have grounds to demand that you do anything differently. I can provide suggestions, guidance and opinions on it, but I can't force you into a decision I agree with.

But I'm also not a vegan. I see the world as much as I can from a neutral perspective. Things are not good nor bad, in and of themselves. The value statements of "good" and "bad" are a matter of perspective. If I were to win the lottery, that is, for all intents and purposes, a good thing.... For me. For everyone who lost, not so much. My win, in the grand scheme of things, isn't good nor bad, simply something that happened.

I would agree that from an empathetic viewpoint, many of the practices I've seen publicized about factory farming from pro-vegan groups or persons, hasn't been good. Often it can be cruel or lacking any sympathy to the animals, which isn't great. However, looking at things more broadly as I tend to do, any such report will be cherry picked as the worst of the worst from an unknown sample of the industry. So I take what I see from those groups and persons with a grain of salt.

Of course the industry, defending itself, will do the opposite and cherry pick examples of their most humane practices and locations. So that isn't the full picture either. Even news media, largely owned by corpo's who are likely invested into the meat industry, will skew their coverage to their own benefit, so even that cannot be fully trusted.

As always the truth lies somewhere in the middle, and bluntly, I can't be bothered to dig deep enough to figure it out. My thoughts on a solution is to impose policy and procedure via laws and ordinances against factory farms for a minimum standard for their livestock, and government run enforcement that's well funded to ensure those regulations are being followed. IMO, that's what government is there to do. If the majority disagree that needs to be done, then such measures will not pass their respective legislative process to be passed into law. In that case, the focus should be on changing the hearts and minds of those who are opposed to the regulation and trying again when the number of people who supports the idea has increased.

You make your own choices though. Get mad, yell in the park at strangers about it, do whatever. You're free to make those choices.

[–] MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca 7 points 7 months ago

The line goes up

[–] MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca 2 points 7 months ago

That dispenser idea is gold.

That should absolutely be a thing.

[–] MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca 1 points 7 months ago

I just want to clarify that I'm saying the fat and lazy Americans won't take the job, not that Americans are fat and lazy therefore they won't take the job.

There's a bit of a difference and I just want to be clear about what I'm saying here.

There's a lot more to consider on this and how it impacts inflation and the viability of American farming as an industry. Since I'm neither and agricultural expert, nor an American, I'm going to dip instead.

Good luck neighbors.

[–] MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca 10 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I see Canadian apathy as a coping mechanism. We've been so fucked over in so many small ways over such a long timeframe that we can't possibly give a fuck about so much of the bullshit that's happening. We simply don't have the energy to even pretend to care.

We'll still show up to the booths and vote when asked (a lot of us will at last), but other than that, we're expecting and un-phased that things are getting worse constantly. Whether that bullshit is coming from our government or something from a neighbor or whatever, doesn't matter.

Our apathy should not be confused with either a willingness to take action when we feel strongly about something, nor an inability to take action.

I am Canadian, and every person I've met who can say the same has a lot of National pride. We're known for being kind, and we're proud of it. Push us the wrong way, and we'll burn down the white house. (iykyk)

[–] MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca 18 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I still don't like Ford, but I do like that he was going to do this.

I don't like that he delayed when the tariffs were delayed.

Honestly, these guys need to piss or get off the pot. Either do what you're saying you'll do, or make a swift exit from the job. Honestly.

[–] MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca 66 points 7 months ago (2 children)

So...... Are we supposed to just bend over and take it?

The fuck?

I can't say I'm surprised though. Some corpo advocating for something that will help them profit? What a surprise.

view more: ‹ prev next ›