MystikIncarnate

joined 2 years ago
[–] MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca 7 points 6 months ago (8 children)

Well. I think I'm officially out of touch with the newest generations slang terms. I only understood about half of that.

[–] MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca 28 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Between the post and some of the comments, I'm pretty sure we're on the worst time.

At least, the worst surviving timeline. I'm sure plenty of "worse" timelines have existed that killed off the entirety of the planet.

This is just the worst of what's left.

[–] MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca 6 points 6 months ago

I support this.

[–] MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca 8 points 6 months ago

I've worked in IT for most of my career. I've seen some shit. I'm on the older side of "millennial". Not old enough to be on the cusp, but almost immediate after. I have had computers as a part of my life since I was young enough to remember, starting with a 286/386 that my dad used at home.

One thing I've noticed is that most companies shit doesn't stink. What I mean by that is that all of them, to some extent, hide, cover up, or otherwise deny that their product has any issues whatsoever. I did a lot of VMware training back in the day, there were good reasons for that, but I won't get into it .. anyways, all of their training was about how it's supposed to work. There's zero material about what to do when it doesn't work like it is supposed to... Even "troubleshooting" courses are designed to help you fix the configuration of the system using only methods sanctioned by the company, because any fault or flaw in their product must be because you aren't using it right, or you simply don't know how.

I've known so many millennials, especially in the tech space, that had to fix their own problems because the product, and the company that made it, believes that their shit doesn't stink. There's nothing wrong with their product, you either don't know how to use it, or you aren't using it correctly,

Meanwhile, here in reality, all their shit sucks to all fuck, and their product is little more than hour garbage.

Yay?

[–] MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca 3 points 6 months ago

Assumptions are the corner stone of the curse of knowledge.

NTs make a lot of assumptions about the listener and how they will understand something, because they always operate within a contextual box. They either don't care, or don't want to examine their statements from outside perspectives because their perspective is the only one that matters to them. That makes it sound worse than it is, but it's accurate.

Neurodivergents generally spend a nontrivial amount of time trying to "fit in" with the NTs, often at the cost of their own mental well-being, but I digress. The majority of divergents have the skillset of understanding someone else's point of view, since it's a critical tool when building up a persona, aka masking.

I don't care what anyone says, that's a skillset, and it can be extremely useful. It's often not used in a good, or productive way (looping back to the argument of masking being mentally burdensome here). As a tool, out can be used to great benefit, or great detriment, depending on how it's used.

[–] MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca 2 points 6 months ago

That's apt. I like it.

[–] MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca 6 points 6 months ago (4 children)

Neurotypicals seem to suffer from the curse of knowledge far more than others. The worst part is, they're neither aware of it, nor do they want to be aware of it.

They don't realize how many assumptions they're making about what you know, and that the information they're assuming you have is the same information that they are working from.

For the uninitiated, the curse of knowledge is a concept where, by knowing the context of a thing, you understand it, but others do not because they don't have the context of that thing. It's a curse because the speaker with the curse of knowledge assumes that others have that context, often unaware that context needs to be provided for that thing to be understood.

The easiest demonstration of this I've seen is, try having someone guess a song by tapping it out on a table or something. More than 90% of the time they will not be able to guess what song you're portraying because they lack the context. As soon as you mention the song, assuming the listener has heard the song before, they will be able to hear the association between your taps and the song, but not before being told.

This phenomenon happens a lot, and it's the worst on government anything because often you are not provided any reference to look up what is intended for the question, form, information or whatever that you're being asked to provide, you just need to provide it, but you lack the context to know what they even mean.

[–] MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca 2 points 6 months ago

A small but important distinction.

Thank you for the information. Have a good day.

[–] MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca 1 points 6 months ago

Maybe, but sometimes you just have to bloody the bullies nose and they'll leave you alone.

Which is what I suspect we all want, eh?

[–] MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca 1 points 6 months ago

Thanks for the ad hominem response.

I will take your comments under advisement exactly as much as I have respect for your opinion.

Have a good day.

[–] MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca 7 points 6 months ago

I don't have strong feelings one way or another, with one exception: why in the hell did anyone think it was okay to own a person and why the fuck did it continue for as long as it did?

That's seriously fucked up.

I'm not a person of color, so I don't think my opinion matters much in the discussion. Black history is just a part of the history of humanity. It should not be erased, it should be viewed as a lesson, like most of the rest of history.

view more: ‹ prev next ›