MystikIncarnate

joined 2 years ago
[–] MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca 21 points 5 months ago (5 children)

I'm older.

Let's just leave it at that

[–] MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Narrator: they didn't.

[–] MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca 3 points 5 months ago (3 children)

I can likely fall into some version of a category of learned professional. IMO, it's fine, many of us have made our migration to Lemmy. Reddit can burn.

[–] MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca 2 points 5 months ago

That's just it. Police beat and harass people and the public barely takes note. So fighting back and getting beaten isn't really going to move the needle here in terms of public support. Those that would be outraged by someone getting disappeared in broad daylight by thugs in all black with masks on, that are claiming to be law enforcement, will also be outraged by anything more significant. From a public support standpoint, you don't gain a lot of attention by fighting back and getting beaten.

Honestly, someone should go to the local PD and report that person as missing/abducted.

To be clear: anyone with the skillset, knowledge and experience to effectively stand their ground against these kinds of people, absolutely should.

Unless they clearly identify themselves and show proof (badges and documents) that prove their claims of being law enforcement, you should 100% fight back against being kidnapped by these thugs. They are little more than a gang with government funding if they're not doing things "by the book" so to speak.

As far as I can see, most of this kind of thing that's been happening lately is more based on feelings and assumptions by a small group who is going around mostly unchecked, doing a lot of damage. If the police/LEO crowd had a PR problem with BLM (and all related incidents including protests) then this is going to be a complete shit storm when it finally hits the fan, which might be four years from now....

On an individual level, I completely understand why someone untrained and unprepared would want to avoid any harm coming to them by complying, regardless of who the perpetrator is. Whether police, FBI, homeland security, secret service or some other form of LEO, or simply an organized gang of thugs.... Self preservation is going to be the main goal. Far be it for me to fault someone for doing what they feel is going to give them the best outcome in that scenario.

[–] MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca 46 points 5 months ago (2 children)

As much as I agree, resisting is likely going to escalate the situation beyond what most people are willing to deal with.

Face it, very few people have the knowledge and skill required to even put up a fight against anyone that is prepared for that encounter.

I get why the victim here didn't really fight back. I get why she let them take her away. I understand the fear she was probably feeling in that moment, and it can be paralysing for someone who isn't prepared to fight for their life and doesn't have the knowledge, skill, or experience required to handle the situation.

To be clear: I'm not saying this victim is dumb, inexperienced, or lacks general life experience, I would argue quite the opposite, in fact. The problem is that they don't have the knowledge, skill, and experience with confrontations. I'm certain, beyond any doubt, that this person was very intelligent, skilled and experienced; just not with physical confrontation.

This is shameful behavior. Why did they feel the need to ambush a bookworm? Not to insult them so all but they are clearly more of an intellectual person than a combative person.

Disclaimer: I'm not American, I'm just empathetic to those that get disappeared in the middle of the day by people wearing all black without so much as a badge being flashed.

[–] MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca 1 points 5 months ago

That's the trick, isn't it?

Make a thing that helps collaboration that people buy into for long term survival, sacrificing what "could be" to hopefully achieve a better tomorrow...

Nobody has successfully achieved this yet.

[–] MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Interesting concept from what you've described.

As I take it, you'll never find someone who perfectly makes you whole, so you have to become whole on your own before you go and find someone to partner with for life.

[–] MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca 4 points 5 months ago

Agreed. Both me and my partner had need for medical leave from work, while that includes some income from the government, it's about half of the usual amount we would earn if we were working. So, when I was out, she stepped up, when she was out, I stepped up.

That's just what you do when things go sideways. 90% of the time or more, we're completely independent. The time we spend together is because we want to spend that time together.

[–] MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca 37 points 5 months ago (6 children)

As a guy, when I was younger, I jumped from relationship to relationship looking for that exact thing. You know what I got for my trouble? Nothing.

So, during my college years, I spent time by myself, learning how to get by and be okay with surviving without relying on anyone else. It was a farce of course because I was in school, not going to work, but it was close enough.

I got into the workforce and all of the things I forced myself to learn to be independent from literally everyone, was the pivot point where I was able to stabilize my life and start dating.

After a while I knew I didn't want someone who needed me. I wanted someone who 100% could do everything that they needed to do on their own, but wanted me around anyways.

I found what I was looking for. I put a ring on it.

I don't worry when she goes out in her vehicle that she bought with her own money for her own purposes, that she's going to go find someone "better" because neither of us care about what's "better" than whatever else. I don't have to worry that she'll call and say she needs money because x, y, or z. She has her own money she made, that she can spend however she wants.

We split household costs, we enjoy eachother company and we value that we aren't relied on by the other for everything. It goes both ways.

As things have gone, the line between "mine" and "hers" has blurred to the point that, unless it's a high dollar value item, it's just ours. Because bothering to remember who paid for what is a waste of time and effort. Cars, yes, anything else? Probably not.

[–] MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca 3 points 5 months ago (2 children)

I agree with the underlying concept, that having low/no empathy is rewarded under the current capitalist systems that most first world countries endorse.

The conflict I have with that mentality, which drives me, personally, away from it, is that if you go back in the history books, we only survived some eras because of strong communal bonds and collaboration with our tribe. In every circumstance, collaboration has been more beneficial economically, than any other option.

Therefore, I reject the selfish capitalist ideals and embrace empathy for the sake of humanity and my role in it.

I'll note, I am neither rich, nor American.

[–] MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca 2 points 5 months ago

Short tape, just like my penis!

Ha! Ha. Ha.ha..... :(

[–] MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca 2 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Title of your sex tape

view more: ‹ prev next ›