MystikIncarnate

All fair. I'm not trying to say you're doing it wrong at all, quite the opposite.

And yes, redundancy is nice, but it really depends on the importance of the data on the system and the budget.

To be blunt: if Lemmy.ca goes down for any length of time, that would suck for everyone here, but nobody will die, there won't be any loss of profits or whatever... In business talk, the risk of what could be lost due to an outage is less than the cost of the hardware to prevent an outage.

I understand your position and an in warranty Dell server system isn't cheap.

What you're currently going is clearly working. So I don't have any complaints.

There's always the exceptions, but they're rare, and getting more rare.

The vast majority of works are owned by a few major corporations, even smaller, more indie games often get published through a major studio, which then retains a good amount of the profit. Almost all media, TV and movies, is owned by one of a handful of companies. Music is largely the same.

It goes the same way for so many other things too. It's not just games and media.

There are always going to be exceptions but on the whole, it's vastly more likely/common that the people profiting from something is a large, faceless organization, which only answers to their shareholders.

To be fair, they're going to see the movies in the theatre, so the characters in this comic don't know what they're in for yet.

The more important thing is that one of the people in the cartoon is much happier/more comfortable in the second frame....

Yeah, why the fuck not?

Obviously, something made in a specialized vehicle manufacturing plant will be better/more durable/whatever, but given the option between downloading a car vs spending a year's salary to buy one.... I'd rather download one.

Unless my wages get better (which they are not) or cars get cheaper (which they won't), I'll continue to have this opinion.

There's a nontrivial number of cars that cost more than a house did in the 80's and 90's. So it's entirely possible for someone to spend the same dollar value on their home, when purchasing it in the 90's, as they do 25 years later, buying a house in the 2020's.

Stupid.

The only damage that exists from piracy is to the copyright holders profits.....

Since the copyright holder is usually a corporation that is owned by shareholders, the majority of which are richer than all of us combined, ask me if I give a shit and I will show you my field of shits to give, and you will see that it is barren.

Eat the rich. Or Luigi them... I don't care.

I'm a sysadmin by day and.... Only one host? And it needs 1TB of RAM? Seems excessive. Probably not though. IDK how optimized Lemmy is.

There's a lot I could say here but I'll limit myself to this: the proof is in the pudding. Lemmy.ca is working well. You all should be very proud of what you've done.

Pretty much all women should take this advice.

Being subtle will regularly, if not almost always be missed. Us dudes are too wrapped up in whatever dumb shit we're thinking about to notice the subtlety. Grabbing my dick, definitely gets my attention. If you don't know what to say, just grab a dick.

We'll let you know if there's any reason not to, but bluntly, few things are so important that they need to be finished before getting freaky.

Jokes on you. They just dilute the royalty payment among all the artists you've streamed, so Spotify's cut isn't really bring affected.

Fun right?

Well, I'm sure a human domicile would be a bit more robust than "alligator Alcatraz" so instead of 8 days, it might take more like.... 8 weeks? To build something comparable for the homeless?

Depending on how complex each housing unit is (bathrooms/kitchens/whatever) possibly more or less. Idk.

But knowing that the world runs on capitalist dollars, there's no profit in it. They can't pay rent, they don't have any money, and they would actively cost you money, either in property tax, water, power, and/or food... Not to mention any replacement costs for any fixtures or furniture that's damaged/stolen.

Not saying the unhoused are thieves, but a nontrivial number of them are desperate, and desperate people do things that they otherwise wouldn't consider doing.

In any case, the solution to the homeless "problem" (being that people are homeless at all) is not just housing, but also community services to get any drug users into their respective rehabilitation programs, and anyone willing and able to work, into job placements... Mental health services...

All of these things cost money and don't yield any profits, so I understand why they're not done. That doesn't mean I'm ok with it not being done, it's a shame that we've left a portion of the population to fend for themselves on the streets and we almost universally dehumanize them as less than a person because they're homeless. They're people. We should take care of them because they're people.

No child left behind, but anyone post highschool that's living on the streets, fuck them.... I guess.

None of us did.

I didn't get a say in whether or not to be born. I'm just here now and I have to deal with all of this shit.

It's not AI.

There's one big tell that I don't think AI is advanced enough to replicate.

Op took this picture though a window that had multiple panes of glass. So there's an echo of the image from the secondary reflections between the panes of glass.

I also can't spot and of the debris in the shot blending into itself. Everything seems to be complete objects.

But that reflection? I've never seen AI do anything like that.

In case anyone doesn't quite see what's going on here, the image is taken from inside (lights seem to be off from where the camera is), through thermal glass into a concrete window space, which is common for places that have basements so the window can serve as an emergency exit (even if you need to break it to get out)...

Looks like there's some kind of evergreen tree not far from where the window is, given the debris in the photo.

Great shot OP.

I can see why, it looks AI as hell...

I think it looks nice. AI or not.

I'd have to stare at it for longer than I have to decide if it's AI. So until I can do that, I'm going to trust the OP until I can verify their claims.

Edit: definitely not AI. Nice shot OP.