I'm pretty sure the user I was speaking to was gen x.
Soooooooo....
MystikIncarnate
joined 2 years ago
This is something I should be doing.
I need quite a lot of space for backups and I don't have enough space for them. I should at least start with partial backups with whatever I can fit in the storage I have.
My weak point right now is off-site, and homelab. My homelab isn't backed up at all, and my personal data is only backed up on-site.
It's better than nothing, but I should be doing better. I work in IT afterall. I think this is in the same vein as the mechanics car....
As someone working in IT, I don't care about your data either. Just don't come crawling to me for help when it all goes wrong.
That being said, one drive/drop box/Google drive/whatever cloud storage.... IMO, that's fine for personal files.
I don't personally like the "full disk" backups for personal stuff. It seems like massive overkill. Like, you're backing up Windows and applications that are probably out of date, and stuff.... Why? Plus restoring a full disk image to a bare-metal system is a massive pain in the backside. Unless it's a server that needs to get up and running ASAP after a failure, just back up the important/unique files (generally the user folder), and if the worst happens, reinstall everything and restore the important files.
The only point on my IT approved backup list that you don't meet the criteria for is incremental/historical snapshots or restore points. Bluntly, if you're okay not having those and accepting the liability that if the files get deleted by accident using a legitimate method to delete them, then that's your risk to accept.
None of what you're doing ruffles my jimmies. As long as you're making an informed decision, and accepting the risks, then the rest is on you. If you don't care, then I certainly don't care either.
Scotty, is that you?
Unless you want to go to large scale cluster storage systems, nothing.
Raid is the best way to get disk-level redundancy for a disk volume.
I'm mainly using RAID 6, but I'm still using a lot of SATA drives. I'll probably need to go with one of the software raids, like z2 when I move away from SATA.
Raid is no longer viable as a performance component, but it is completely viable for redundancy. Large scale cluster storage like Ceph is the way forward for anything larger than what can fit in a single chassis, or a single disk controller. Basically if you have or need more than one 45 drive chassis for storage, look into Ceph.
For everything less, RAID, and if you don't need redundancy and just want performance, just get a high end NVMe drive and do backups.
Yes. I'll show you mine if you show me yours.
The cause seems to be the lemmings that are posting cats.
I just don't see why so many people are dead set on only solar/wind/hydro as "green" and nuclear and other more exotic power generation methods that don't emit greenhouse gases are somehow unacceptable.
Isn't the goal net zero? Why are we quibbling about how we achieve that?
Can't we just do whatever we must to get there and move on with our existence?
We put it back in the ground where we found it in the first place.
I don't see how people are A-OK with uranium and other naturally occurring nuclear isotopes beneath their feet, but used fuel rods from a nuclear power plant? No fucking way!
Your house is full of radon Joe, the nuclear waste in a sealed casket, buried in the side of a mountain nowhere near you isn't what is going to give you cancer.
Outlook is a long list unto itself of random crap that's probably going to go wrong.
To be fair, it's not like word or Excel are any less complex, but people tend to know those apps way better for some reason.
The Web version is taking over. Just like they did with teams, they're starting a webview version of Outlook. They're very creative this time, calling it "new Outlook" 🤦♂️
It's all very dumb.
I completely agree on the view settings too. It's like a world unto itself just to sort and organize a single view of Outlook. I helped one user the other day, who simply wanted to see everything as conversations. It's an easy fix, and it wasn't the reason they logged a ticket, but it took about 8 seconds and I was already connected to their system.
Do office workers not have a requirement to learn basic MS office skills anymore?
I'm a lot like you. For the most part, I try to look beyond the question being asked, and find the root cause. If the root cause is because of a skill issue, I'll direct them to the next logical resource. If it's not a skill issue, or I can't determine that it's a skill issue, then I'll continue to test until I can make that determination.
9 times out of 10, if I find a solution to make a thing work in a program, I'll share that with them, and let them take it from there.
A lot of the people I support are working in the finance space and my company has an entire support department for finance applications. I'll either bounce the problem off of them, or just direct them to the finance support team for guidance.
This wasn't either of those things. It wasn't even asking how. It was straight up telling me to do a thing for them, in a program they should know how to use. It's not a complex finance program or anything, it's literally Outlook.
No advancements?
Is SMR a joke to everyone?
Look, I'm not saying nuclear is the only path forward, far from it. I don't think any path is the only path forward. I believe that we'll need a compilation of various generation methods to meet the demands of tomorrow.
The only thing I want to see in that future is no coal, nor fuel plants. Those two are the most common types of greenhouse gas-producing plants in use. The objective, in my mind, is to entirely phase them out. Whatever gets us there, is good with me. If that turns out not to be nuclear, that's fine too. If SMR or any other kind of nuclear is required to make that a reality, that's also fine.
I. Don't. Care.