And if you watch too much TV, you'll get square eyes!
I have never seen a tankie oppose liberalism. I've seen plenty of tankies say they oppose liberalism, but then they act like liberals. It's very confusing.
Well obviously it's only real communism if being gay is illegal and the government sells lumber and steel to Nazi Germany to use in weapons.
Radical centrists who want a form of socialism where everyone is oppressed by the state, thereby combining the ideas of the left and the right.
No, that's not true. Authoritarians can't be communist, because communism is stateless. You mean authoritarian socialists.
Yes.
Harry Potter's magic system isn't simple.
Rincewind isn't useless at most things, he's only useless at magic.
Esk is actually able to use magic to solve problems, because she's a precocious child and also female.
Well, the needs of a fiction reader and the needs of a character in the world are different. Harry actually needed to learn magic. And there's no logic to it, so all he could do was rote memorisation. He would have been happier with a magic system that makes sense.
Hermione is supposed to be a genius nerd, and yet she does far less in 7 books to actually study her magic system, than Vin has done by the start of the second book. Vin isn't a nerd or a genius, she's just a capable hero living in a world where magic makes sense, so she's better at studying than Hermione. Hermione gets 8 hours to do it a day for 6 years and still can't compete with Vin.
It also corrupts Isildur, makes Bilbo grumpy, gives us insight into Galadriel, creates tension between Frodo, Sam, and Gollum, gives Gollum multiple personalities, starts an argument at Rivendell, makes Gandalf fuck off for a decade, gives us insight into the strengths of hobbits, weakens Frodo, drives the epilogue, creates the ringwraiths, and contextualises the stagnancy of the elves.
Looking evil isn't a limitation, it's flavour text. It doesn't affect the story, it just gives us vibes. If there's one thing Rowling is good at, it's writing flavour text to convey vibes. But there's no plot in that limitation. Horcruxes break Sanderson's second law, and that's why they're not as interesting as the One Ring. The One Ring puts challenges in front of every character who interacts with it: Sauron, Isildur, Elrond, Bilbo, Gandalf, Frodo, Gollum, Galadriel, even Samwise. It promises all of them something they want, and takes a price from every one, changing the course of the story many times. Samwise is the least affected, but it still takes away something he loves; his best friend.
Horcruxes do four things: they kill Dumbledore, give Harry a quest, make Ron grumpy, and ex machina the deus. Bringing Voldy back and manifesting Riddle don't count because those are retcons, and we're talking about writing processes.
Two of those things they do are just because they're a macguffin. Literally anything the characters want could have been substituted. Ron grumpy is, again, flavour text. The Deus ex Machina is the one interesting thing they do to change the story.
They claim to be the only real leftists, because communism requires putting down revolutions with tanks and supporting genocidal dictators. They call it "the dictatorship of the proletariat", where proletariat means worker. They think a dictatorship can be leftist.