MrAlternateTape

joined 2 years ago
[–] MrAlternateTape@lemm.ee 2 points 2 months ago

Turns out, I am a bad person. It is funny though.

[–] MrAlternateTape@lemm.ee 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Don't worry, Google and Apple already know this....but so far we can only hope they will never agree to do something like that.

And if they do, nobody will know about it anyways.

[–] MrAlternateTape@lemm.ee 1 points 2 months ago

I would write a lengthy response, but....

[–] MrAlternateTape@lemm.ee 3 points 3 months ago

I've heard most of the shops sell the same matrassen, but they just give them different names so you cannot compare prices. Which means you can make prices anything you want as long as you have a somewhat believable story about the quality.

[–] MrAlternateTape@lemm.ee 4 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Because a machine is expected to do it right the first time. Because it's supposed to do the exact same thing everytime with the exact same input parameters. If you give it the exact same input every time and you get a different result every time it is not reliable to function as automation.

Humans are just that. Humans. They make mistakes sometimes. The reason humans can keep doing the work is that there is no better alternative. Machines can't do it, so who else is gonna do it? Either humans build your house or nobody does. There is little choice there.

So if a machine is to take over that job, it better do it right and reliable and cheaper.Because humans can already do it right and reliable. And there's little money saving if a human still needs to check all the work.

[–] MrAlternateTape@lemm.ee 2 points 3 months ago (3 children)

Well, why did it not do it right the first time then? If the doublecheck gives a different result, then which is the right result? If I can ask the same question twice and I get two different answers, how I or the machine known which is the right answer? And if the machine knows, then why would it need to doublecheck? A machine can do it right the first time if it knows how, right?

[–] MrAlternateTape@lemm.ee 38 points 3 months ago (14 children)

Yea, well...for the heavy lifting it could be nice. But I'm not letting AI build my house.

Lifting heay crap to the roof or something like that? Sure. That is what machines are good at.

Welding? Well welding robots have existed for long time, they just need to programmed perfectly. I've worked with a couple of them, the results are not always consistent and they required some quality checks. It is easier. Manual welding takes more skill and takes longer. I just don't need the AI part though. That makes it unpredictable. And if I let a robot do something, it should be predictable.

I do woodworking and fixing around the house. Even when building new stuff, there are always issues that you have to solve on the spot. Walls that are not straight, angles that are not perfect, spaces you cannot reach et cetera.

As long as AI does not get it 100% right every time it is not touching my house. And yes, a professional doesn't reach that rate either, but at least they know and doublecheck themselves and know how to fix things.

[–] MrAlternateTape@lemm.ee 3 points 3 months ago

Funny, but proper therapy would mean that you learned how to handle the trauma so it would not be so easy to do this.

[–] MrAlternateTape@lemm.ee 15 points 3 months ago

Perhaps we have not yet found the animals that they have had to kill in the past to survive....

[–] MrAlternateTape@lemm.ee 33 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

My expectations? I guess I expected I could have at least half of what my parents had. Which I almost can. They afforded the house on one salary and my mom stayed at home. Me and my gf both have to have full time jobs. But, we can only pay a smaller house.

My parents had five kids and sometimes struggled with money. We have one kid, two salaries and still struggle with money. For basic stuff. Just food and drinks and stuff you need. And the occasional bottle of wine or whisky.

So I guess I got around half of what my parents had. What I would have hoped for is that if two people work 40 hours a week and most of the time more, we would not have to struggle. I would have hoped we could save some money.

I would have hoped that I would not be waiting with service for my motorcycle until I have the money. Or be anxious about the yearly review of my car, because there could be high costs to get it approved another year.

I don't mind working, I don't mind working extra, I don't mind working hard. But right now it feels like I get nothing in return. It's just expected, and you get to survive. That's it. You want more? A little more space in your house, or a little bit more time for yourself? Can't be done. And that is frustrating.

Edit: seems people agree with me, thanks for the support.

[–] MrAlternateTape@lemm.ee 1 points 3 months ago

It actually makes sense. I've seen big and small companies. Small companies are focused, flexible and people usually have a connection with the company.

At bigger companies, everything goes slow. And nobody gives a shot about anything. They do what they need to do in order to get paid, but not a step more. Everything is slow because at least 2 layers of management need to sign off on decisions.

[–] MrAlternateTape@lemm.ee 1 points 3 months ago

That's a very general statement. Considering each and every bike will have a different history, and different wear and tear. Then there is also the issue of the skill of the rider. That can make a huge difference too.

And with every new bike I ride I always test the brakes first. I practice emergency stops regularly.

To OP, Congrats om the nice bike. It's a great machine and I hope you will have a lot of fun with it.

view more: ‹ prev next ›