MouldyCat

yeah well when you're ready to join us in the 21st century, we'll be here waiting. until then have fun with your stone age incomprehension of the heavens and self-aggrandizing tales of fabulous rewards after death.

locked it away in the middle of nowhere already

Why would they do that lol

People would be in awe of this creature. It's speaking the perfect word of god, understandable to all. It cannot be killed and clearly defies all scientific understanding of our modern age. (This thing would pre-date the birth of true science though and more than likely prevent science even coming to be - there would be no need of science or any kind of human progress if we had an indisputable communication channel with god such as this)

I can't help but chuckle at the puny god that you seem to believe in though. God - if it exists and I genuinely believe that question is unanswerable - would be an entity outside time and space way beyond the tiniest comprehension of any human. It would have absolute power over every aspect of the universe. Protecting a dog from any number of humans with any type of weaponry would be such a trivial task for such a being. If the dog didn't want to be moved, it wouldn't move. If it wanted to pass through a wall it would pass though like a red hot ball bearing through butter.

Seems like there's a lot of ways, no? A talking immortal dog, just off the top of my head. That would be hard to counter, especially after the first 500 years and it's still there, spouting the word of god in any language you like.

I'm convinced from the evidence that God doesn't care what we believe. If there even is such a thing, and I don't think it's possible to meaningfully answer that, there are many better ways to communicate vital information to people on earth other than choosing someone to relay your messages in a way that is indistinguishable from a mentally ill person who just hears voices in their head.

ah I see. I misunderstood - when you said "I’d rather pick what is actually true", you meant you'd pick a story you like and call it truth. Yes that's also an option, why not.

What's that?

Christians worship Christ, while Catholics worship .. er .. Cath

I guess there isn't a point given to you by someone/something else, but you're free to pick one of your own if you want. Or not. Ultimately we just have our evolved desire to survive and see our loved ones do well.

You think if people who publish their work publicly didn't research things like this, they would just never be discovered?

At least this way, we all know about the possibility, and further research can be done to see what can mitigate it.

well obviously it won't, that's why you need ethical output restrictions

buy illegal things

but that is actually what we're here for in this thread - we want to buy things that our masters say we cannot.

this is *definitely* the wrong URL... (website is for the "Twin Cities", whatever they are, American in any case)

This appears to be the intended story, don't know if the intended source: https://www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/news/greater-manchester-news/moment-coward-chased-brave-members-32129942

(it has one of those cookie consent things where you either buy a subscription or agree to cookies, so open in a private window (or just use Reader View if you're a firefox person))

Edit: regarding the story itself, it's curious how the police refer to the bike as an ebike, while it appears to be actually an electric motorbike based on the CCTV frame-grab in the article and the fact that the rider was jailed for over two years for "causing serious injury by dangerous driving, dangerous driving, driving with no licence or insurance". Is that a deliberate attempt by the old bill to smear ebikes or am I being overly cynical?