MossyFeathers

Probably nothing beyond normal VR stuff. It's still pretty new and it sounds like Apple is still trying to figure out the chicken or the egg problem when it comes to developing an entirely new platform and have decided to try putting the egg first to see if anyone will incubate it for them. Who knows if they'll commit long enough for it to pay off. Tbh I can see VR enthusiasts still getting something out of it since it sounds like people have figured out how to get it working with steamvr. Other than that though, I don't really see any uses for it. I think they're going to have to spend a lot of time looking for problems that are worth paying $1,000~$2,000 to solve (I'm assuming that's what a "consumer" version would cost), and then refine their solution until it feels natural before widespread adoption will be a thing.

I've also been to the US (west coast, Portland) and Jebus, that was terrible. First they don't give you a pizza but a slice of pizza, then it's reheated because they make a lot of it and can't sell it fresh. The toppings is dry ham and tasteless cheese, a ton of cheese, but just flavorless cheese. I tried in a couple of places there with practically the same result. Thanks, but no thanks.

WTF, that doesn't sound even remotely correct. How much did you pay, $0.50? You got scammed dude. I'm from Texas which, afaik, is probably at the bottom of the list of "places you think of when someone says, 'pizza'" but I've had way better pizza than what you're describing. Hell, Pizza Hut is probably better than what you're describing lol. That sounds horrid.

nor anything they would foam at the mouth to promote

Honestly, maybe they should lmao. It'd be really funny to see how people react to Democrats leaning hard into the unhinged shit the right is putting out and countering by committing to not do the thing the Republicans are doing; while also treating it like some legitimately new, revolutionary idea. It'd take a lot of work, but American politics would become extremely entertaining for the final two months before the election.

Listen, I don't blame them for trying to snag a baby. Babies are fucking delicious man. So tender and juicy...

Y'all should try one sometime!

Tbh I'd want a lawn. Not because I like grass, but because of the outdoor space. A community garden with dedicated plots would be a decent alternative, but I like the idea of having some space in front of my home to decorate or cultivate. That said, seeking green space shouldn't be mutually exclusive with density. Build stepped pyramids or something, where each floor is offset by the previous floor's yard so that everyone's yards have sunlight but you're still building upwards.

Also, row houses are a thing. Medium density but still have a small front and back garden.

Am American, can confirm that's the symbol of our volunteer fuel truck fleet. They're volunteers who drive around in marked vehicles with huge gas tanks capable of filling multiple cars before needing to refuel. The fleet was established in response to people finding themselves stranded in the middle of nowhere without gas. The US is a big place and they'd misjudge how much fuel they have and end up miles away from any gas stations.

Some people will even get super into it and cover their cars with flags and shit. It's super patriotic and fun to watch. Additionally, the US Republican party is the main supporter of this program, so most fuel vehicles are gonna be owned by hardcore Republicans (the Dems want to end it in favor of a government-funded fleet of emergency battery trucks). As such, probably like, 95% of trump trucks are part of the fuel truck fleet, so feel free to siphon gas from those as well (if you have trouble finding the sticker, don't worry, the sticker is probably just hidden among all the other stickers and flags). You probably won't get in trouble, but if you do (like you get unlucky and siphon from one of the rare, greedy "gas guzzlers", as we like to call 'em), just explain that it was a misunderstanding. It happens all the time, you'll be fine.

That said, be careful while doing it. Some people can be very judgy about who gets gas and who doesn't; if they percieve that you don't actually need the gas then they might get aggressive. It's technically meant for people in need, but like, how many people are gonna find themselves without a place to get gas in the city? Besides, there's no legal requirement for you to prove you have an empty tank. It's illegal for them to stop you, but they might try to do it anyway. As such, the best policy is to wait until they leave and do it while they aren't looking.

Not quite, it isn't, not in overall message

Listen, I may have been horrible at phrasing what I'm saying, but that's legitimately what I've been trying to argue. The difference I guess is that I'm anticipating the possible negative outcomes and saying they should be resolved simultaneously instead of just saying "throw money at them".

you'll see that I didn't object to any additional help, I just insist on substantial cash first

Okay, sooooo... Again, apparently I was bad at explaining myself, but that's basically what I was trying to say, just that instead of cash now, resolve issues later, I think that you should resolve the possible issues at the same time.

reject most firmly your absurd histrionics about inflation.

Why is it hard to believe that rich people will happily destroy the world if it means they get an extra dollar or two? They're already doing it. Recent history has firmly established that rich people are consistently among the worst human beings that humanity has to offer. They would unironically feed a baby into a blender if that meant their company ran 0.1% more efficiently. That's why I'm convinced they'll just fuck people over again. You have to either remove them from the equation as well, or at the very least, quarantine them so their obscene wealth and influence can't hurt anyone in the real world.

And we can make it quick bby. It doesn't have to take long~.

That's literally what I've been saying this entire fucking time you dingus.

Edit:

I'm not convinced that just cash will solve homelessness or poverty. It may help, but it seems like a "give a man a fish, he'll eat for a day, teach a man to fish and he'll eat for a lifetime" kinda situation. Give people the fish so they can eat, but if you want them to actually be independent, then you gotta make sure they have the tools they need to do so.

Key sentence in bold and italics. From my first comment in this thread.

Right... But they gotta be able to afford to continually afford those tools. Rich people try to suck at much money out of people as possible. The moment they hear that poor people are receiving money is the moment they smell blood in the water. They'll just hike up prices in response. That's why I'm not convinced that throwing money at poor people will work.

It's not their fault.

They didn't do anything wrong.

It's the rich people who are the problem.

Get rid of the rich people or their ability to price people out of life and boom! Now the money you give poor people will remain effective. Otherwise they might be able to buy tools today, but the money might not be enough to buy tools again tomorrow.

I give up. You're not reading what I'm saying. I'm actually pretty far left, further left than it seems you or most of the people here are considering how they object to the idea that people should receive whatever assistance they need, not just have money thrown in their face and told to fuck off

Edit: sigh one last try. I think you're fucking with me, and if so then you're doing a really good job, so congrats. Well done, you got me pretty good.

Seriously? You went from giving some homeless people enough money to get accommodation and food to a global inflation crisis?

Actually yes. It sounds unhinged, but when you're talking about rich people, they'll do whatever to get richer. Rich people will unironically bring the economy to the brink of collapse if it means they'll get richer. Where have you been the past, oh I dunno, all of human civilization?

It's not poor people's fault.

It's nothing they've done.

It's all rich people.

Get rid of the rich people. Now you won't have to keep increasing the money you give poor people. Otherwise someone might be able to afford tools today but be unable to buy new ones tomorrow.

US dollars make up nearly 60% of the world's reserve currency. I could be mistaken here, but my understanding is that means a significant chunk of the world is using the USD as a significant part of their currency standard (#2 is the euro with just under 20%). As such, if I understand correctly that means that if the US dollar undergoes inflation, then the rest of the world will experience at least some inflation as well.

MW has barely changed in the USA over decades but has risen much more elsewhere. If the theory were right, USA would have been largely free of inflation...

This is only true if you look at federal minimum wage. Wages aren't keeping up with inflation, but most US cities have an official or unofficial minimum wage of $15/hr. I think that shift happened about 10yrs ago, and afaik nothing's changed since then.

Why? Corporate greed. Poor regulation. International tax avoidance.

Exactly. They knew they could charge more, and so they did. That's what inflation is. Everyone realized they could charge more, so they did. The dollar decreased in value because prices went up across the board.

Inflation.

Firstly, I forgot that a lot of countries don't have the same level of greed as the US, but I'm arguing from an American perspective. Giving out money may legitimately work in other countries, but I think American executives are too greedy for something to work like that in the US at an official capacity without additional intervention. Secondly, I'm not trying to say that. I'm saying to do more than that because I believe that companies in the US are too greedy to allow it to "just work".

Money is great, but do more than that.

Money is great, but do more than that.

Money is great, but do more than that.

Like, how many times do I have to repeat myself?

Money is great, but do more than that.

Money is great, but do more than that.

Money is great, but do more than that.

Prices are increasing faster than inflation but wages have stagnated, yet you're saying that more money won't lead to people once again being priced out of life. That runs contrary to what is already going on.

You need to do things like cap rent, build public housing, make sure they can afford food even when CEOs are renting out pineapples, make sure they have transportation, make sure they have somewhere to live, and so on.

The US specifically runs on greed. If CEOs hear that everyone's going to be getting more money, then they're going to start charging more money because that's how the US works. Just giving out money may work for other countries, but the US is fucked as hell. Charities giving out money doesn't equate to everyone in need getting money which is why prices don't increase, companies don't know who to fleece; but if CEOs could find out who was getting the charity money, they'd absolutely try to charge them more. If everyone is getting money, then the CEOs will just fuck people over again to afford a new yacht.

And even then. Even then there will be people in very poor mental health who desperately need attention but they cannot afford mental health services. These people will not be able to function with money alone. These people need serious help. Money alone will not help these people.

The message I'm trying to convey is that you should have other things available to them if they need it; but you seem to be saying to just throw money at them and tell them to fuck off.