MossyFeathers

Ye, I've heard one of the biggest complaints people have is that they feel like she plays into the "hysterical/impulsive woman" stereotype, but I don't really see it that way. She's a captain who got thrown into the abyss and is trying to get her way out. I've seen people comment on how she threw out the prime directive almost immediately, or that she made decisions that made their trip home longer; compared to Picard who never makes a mistake. Sure, she made some dumb decisions, but comparing her to Picard (who's basically perfect) isn't remotely fair.

Picard is a highly decorated captain running the Federation's flagship in possibly the comfiest position a federation officer can hope for; with a charisma strong enough to answer any conflict with "I think this was all just a big misunderstanding."

Janeway is a captain of a small ship with a crew intended to hunt down insurgents before getting iseki'd to the delta quadrant, killing a large chunk of the original crew and forcing her to team up with the insurgents.

And yeah, of course she's gonna throw out the prime directive; she's going to throw out the entire book. Any good captain would immediately realize that Starfleet regulations work in """civilized""" space, but the further into the unknown you go, the less the regulations make sense. Like, what, was she supposed to just sit there and wait for backup the moment they ran into a problem bigger than them? Yeah, that's a great idea, we'll just wait for Picard to swoop in and tell everyone it was just a big misunderstanding and then Janeway can be on her way. He'll be here soon. Just aaaaanny day now...

Imo, Janeway is a very human (and imo, badass) captain and it'd be more fair to compare her to Kirk than Picard, Sisko or most other captains; and imo she did a much better job than Kirk. At least she wasn't being a sex pest to everyone they met.

When Janeway wants something done, she gets it done, Jane's way.

I find it fascinating that Janeway seems to swing between being everyone's favorite and everyone's most hated captain. I personally think she's awesome and she's one of my favorites.

I don't know where you are, but if your local PD has a slow line then you might try calling that and describe it to them. I say to use the slow line because it could be nothing and it's probably not an emergency as long as no one's fucking with it; but if there's a possibility that it might be explosive then someone should check it out.

I'm kinda looking forward to seeing how this pans out. Personally, I'd want to use it to make small, local hobby networks; kinda like how it used to be that basically anyone with a phone line could start an ISP.

Listen, that creature is furry as fuck and happy to murder me. Fulfills two of my life goals right there.

The decent ones are ridiculously expensive now. It's crazy. If the one he's holding is the one I think it is, that specific models is worth thousands now.

Ah, okay. That makes sense. I missed the, "the whole chain has to be on everyone's PCs" part. I figured it was more like BitTorrent where you don't actually have to have the whole thing, it works as long as everyone has all the parts to put the whole thing together (but the parts can be distributed across a bunch of PCs).

But an AGI isn't an LLM. That's what's confusing me about your statement. If anything I feel like I already covered that, so I'm not sure why you're telling me this. There's no reason why you can't recreate the human brain on silicon, and eventually someone's gonna do it. Maybe it's one of our current companies, maybe it's a future company. Who knows. Except that a true AGI would turn everything upside down and inside out.

I don't think you understand. Your consciousness is just one process amid a myriad of processes that your brain runs. It's that continuity that matters. You're correct that I don't know if my current consciousness is the same as prior consciousnesses, however what matters is that my brain has never shut off, giving me the feeling as though I am the same person; and it is because of that thread that I am the same person (though perhaps with a different consciousness).

Furthermore, you can't achieve immortality through digital consciousness if you just copy the whole thing and throw out the original. Again, it's the continuity. It honestly confuses me why people think that's a rational idea when the very obvious problem is, "what if something goes wrong and human me wakes up?"

That's why you have people, like me, who get frustrated when people start getting philosophical about this shit because they think you can "just make a perfect copy" of a person to achieve immortality.

Seriously?

No.

You just killed yourself and made a copy of yourself. You didn't achieve shit. Your new self might be happy, but your old self is dead. You're not suddenly going to wake up as a digital clone. You're not waking up at all, it's your clone that's waking up.

And hey, if that's good enough for you, then so be it. Just don't pretend you've achieved immortality; it was your digital clone that did. You're still going to die.

It also confuses me that so many people seem to believe that you're literally brain-dead while you sleep. If you were literally brain-dead then there'd be no way for you to wake up. Sleep seems to be when the brain processes memories too, so if your brain fully shut off, then it wouldn't be able to processes memories while you're asleep. Finally, afaik, once the brain shuts off, it can't turn back on; evolution didn't plan for a situation in which someone's been dead long enough for brain activity to cease before their heart starts pumping again. So why does everyone insist that you go brain-dead the moment your head touches the pillow?

She fucked a chimp, didn't she?

Okay, and? What are you trying to say?

Why would money become worthless if AGI is invented? Best case scenario is a benevolent AGI which would likely use its power to phase out capitalism, worst case scenario is that the AGI goes apeshit and, for one reason or another, decides that humanity just has to go. Either way, your money is gonna be worthless.

The only way your money would retain its value is if the AGI is roped into suppressing the masses. However, I think capitalists would struggle to keep a true AGI reigned in; so imo, it's questionable as to whether or not the middle road would be "true" AGI or just a very competent computer program (the former being capable of coming to its own conclusions from the information it's given, the latter being nothing more than pre-programmed conclusions).