MossyFeathers

It's mostly game-related tools that I've discovered typically have Debian versions but no apparent (official) Arch support. Seems like most people who develop modding tools, save editors, stuff like that, mainly use windows and if you're lucky will have a Mac and maybe Debian version

Edit: the windows binaries aren't a huge issue, they usually work in Wine just fine; I just prefer not having to use wine.

Thanks!

Alright, cool. Why not Manjaro? I did a quick Google search and saw people saying Manjaro is bloated in comparison to EndevorOS, are there other reasons as well?

I doubt I'll ever have to do that since I don't really work in software development (I'm guessing that's only relevant in software dev?), but thanks for the heads up.

I've been trying to decide what distro I want to go with for my desktop (Microsoft recently pushed copilot onto my windows 10). While I like the idea of Arch (fast, lightweight) and the fact that it'd be fully compatible with whatever I get on my steam deck, stuff like this makes me think a Debian-based distro would be better.

(That and the fact that most Linux stuff is designed for Debian and I don't have enough experience to try and rebuild Debian stuff for Arch)

When you're a gunfish, every shooting is a school shooting.

Jesus Christ. 12 key caps (one of each kind) is >$800. Additionally, I used to faun over jelly keys like everyone else, but tbh I'm just not impressed with the way they look anymore. Idk what it is, but looking at those key caps... They look kinda sloppy compared to their previous ones. I know I'm being kinda judgy, but at $50 for a single key cap...

That's a lot of tires to make the bottom of a cooling tower light up like that. Aren't those things normally absolutely huge?

Get confused as to why I have a son in the first place. Then shove him into a meat grinder until all that's left is his finger (or maybe his eyeball). Then burn the remains so it can't get back up. I don't know what it is, but it's not human.

It's entirely possible for a natural nuclear reactor to occur. So yes, you can separate humans from the process. Make a reactor that a human can't reasonably open and has zero chance of melting down, and you have safe nuclear.

Also yes, you can make a reactor that can't melt down (without human interference). It's called an RTG and they're commonly used on spacecraft.

It's been a while since I read about it, but iirc Chernobyl is suspected to have been sabotage because they turned all the safeties off and then basically walked away until it started melting down.

Fukushima was doomed from the start. Iirc they were told not to build the plant there due to extreme earthquake and tsunami risk, but they did it anyway.

Those two disasters were caused by stupidity and negligence. You can argue that humans can't be trusted with radioactive materials, but the process itself is pretty safe. Meanwhile coal plants release significantly more radiation over their lifetimes than nuclear reactors do.

Afaik there aren't any carnivorous plants that can be killed with rainwater. It's much more likely that they were out where the sprinkler could get them (hard water, chlorine, etc will kill carnivorous plants). Never, ever water carnivorous plants with tap water.