Monstrosity

joined 1 month ago
[–] Monstrosity@lemmy.today 2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

I appreciate that but I use down votes as a disagree button all the time lol, it's alright People are righteously pissed about AI b/c it is absolutely being abused by hyper Capitalists & bad faith actors.

But I wonder how many folks are as vehemently opposed to offline, private models that run locally to assist with simple things like creating nvim .config files & other tedious but helpful chores?

The conversation has been poisoned but AI isn't going away so imo we need to continue having open, honest discussions about it.

[–] Monstrosity@lemmy.today -3 points 2 weeks ago (9 children)

Well, you are making up head cannon. Check my profile, there's a Pixelfed link. I'm an artist not an engineer.

[–] Monstrosity@lemmy.today -4 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

Yeah I do. This is a small, volunteer, open source developer creating something for our benefit & has found a way to ease their workload but the purity brigade demands they type everything out by hand from scratch b/c they have big feels & are reflexively reactionary about AI. Seems shitty to me.

[–] Monstrosity@lemmy.today 1 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

Good! Whatever helps volunteer open source devs relieve their work load is okay by me 👍

[–] Monstrosity@lemmy.today 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I'll let you know if I ever manage to do it 👍

[–] Monstrosity@lemmy.today -2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Two things, the experiment you are referring to was specifically designed to deceive whereas AI vulnerabilities would just be simple bugs.

Secondly, the security requirements of the Linux Kernel are way more important/stringent than Lutris, which has no special access & is often even further sandboxed if installed via Flatpak.

I just don't see this as an issue until it proves to be one. People are always welcome to fork a "pure" version.

view more: ‹ prev next ›