Miaou

They have already access to SO's CC content, why would they get it from the fediverse?

You actually do more than just sit there and sign prescriptions and forms however

I'll guess, and I'll say, like every other MD outside the USA.

Importing wage slaves to feed the capitalist meat grinder is no solution either, but given whom they elected recently it seems the Italian solution to this problem will be inspired from the Handmaid's tale

To no one's surprise, really.

goto is used in C for this exact kind of early return management. The person you answered to does not maintain code I think

And I'm going to make you read those blocks because they are there for a damn reason. What are you even reading at this point if you're not reading the preconditions? That's how you end up dereferencing null pointers, when you have ten nested ifs you can barely see it on your screen

... Or because they see the things they ran away from following them. But of course this is not compatible with the myth that immigration is unconditionally good, so its better to pretend those immigrants are just trying to close the door behind them (have people who say this shit ever spoken to actual immigrants BTW?)

Extremely trivial? Init stuff probably shouldn't be touched by random user app, systemd cannot always be assumed, login shell can probably do this but syntax will vary by shell, and the only other I can think of is WM dépendent (although I assume the big ones will agree on using desktop files, i3 for example does not, and location might vary there too).

It's not difficult but to handle this generically requires some work to handle various scenarios.

I don't understand what "appeal to emotion" you're talking about.

You seem to project given what you wrote in your second paragraph however, given that's not even remotely relevant to the conversation here. I hope you're not ever in charge of anything that matters.

1. "Offensive" was autocorrected to "official"

2. Russians did not destroy infrastructure because they hope to use for themselves (the fact that I have to explain this makes me think engaging with you is a waste of my time). That's the difference between a war of invasion and the mindless bombing the USA likes to do in whatever conflict they get involve in on the other side if the globe

3. Typing on phone is annoying, so my messages get a bit terse. But your whole rant previously is about how bad the Ukrainians are. OK, sure. I have not much interest in that. But, how does that justify the Russian attack? How is any of this Ukrainian nenonazi stuff relevant? Russia was never under threat from Ukraine. Even if literal-Hitler was reborn there, how is bombing Kiev helping anyway? Authoritarian governments LOVE wars, it gives them an enemy, it gives them power, it gives them a mean to get rid of political opponents.

So we can either believe Putin a philanthropist ready to sacrifice bravely his troops for no benefit but the de-nazification of a nuke-free, not-in-nato country, or we can recognise this as just a pretext for grabbing land (supported by the preservation of infrastructure). Oh and that part I wrote about authoritarian governments loving war applies to Russia just as well by the way.

After all of this, if Russia is in it for no personal benefit but a moral victory, why are they not withdrawing? After all they have supposedly nothing to gain by continuing the war, since they don't intend to occupy the country?

Such a long post to avoid explaining why the Russian official is justified. Half of what you wrote is in bad faith (not destroying critical infrastructure... Out of good heart? Really?) or simply not relevant (should we invade every fascist government out there? Besides, nothing better to consolidate an authoritarian government than a war, so good job Russia on that front ?)