Mereo

joined 2 years ago
[–] Mereo@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 years ago

I'm just so confused by all this. What's his end game? Why doesn't let his IT team handle the redirect as it redirects to .twitter.com which doesn't work. Why X?

I guess a lot of these questions will not be answerable.

[–] Mereo@lemmy.ca 6 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Nice setup! What's the monitor?

[–] Mereo@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 years ago

Mlem is far from 1.0 release. It's extremely choppy compared to 5 other Lemmy clients I'm testing and it has various bugs still such as not handling well going from portrait to landscape. This software still needs much work.

[–] Mereo@lemmy.ca -1 points 2 years ago

Cool!

Anyway, what were we saying?...

[–] Mereo@lemmy.ca 7 points 2 years ago

Let it be destroyed. We have a new beautiful girlfriend/boyfriend named Lemmy-Kbin. Let go of your ex and move on, much healthier for you.

[–] Mereo@lemmy.ca 44 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Because these machine learning algorithms only put out what they learn so that they can target the right videos to people. In this case, I think people were searching Youtube for these kinds of videos, so Youtube's algorithm suggested them.

[–] Mereo@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 years ago

I think we are on the same page. There is a sociological concept of Generic Worker and Self-Programmable worker by the sociologist Manuel Castell. The self-programmable workforce is endowed with the ability to retrain and adapt to new tasks, new processes and new sources of information, as technology, demand and management accelerate their pace of change. Generic labor, on the other hand, is exchangeable and disposable, and coexists in the same circuits with machines and unskilled labor from all over the world.

Generic workers are already being replaced by automation (robots), but now LLMs are threatening self-programmable workers. The only way to adapt to the new reality is to become indispensable in training LLMs. It will completely upend the current job market as we know it. And as you said, the danger is if we treat LLMs as generative AIs.

[–] Mereo@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)
[–] Mereo@lemmy.ca 6 points 2 years ago

Oh boy, I just joined yesterday so I hope it's not me. I'm here to learn from the professionals.

[–] Mereo@lemmy.ca 6 points 2 years ago (2 children)

I read the article but felt writing a "generic" comment about AI as various studios also wants to replace writers with AIs. I've been thinking about this for a long time.

[–] Mereo@lemmy.ca 38 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (12 children)

People don't understand that it's not AI, it's machine learning. Imagine you have someone alone in a room. He takes the experience and knowledge of people and puts it into his library. When someone asks for something, it uses what it's got in its library to answer that person's question. But that person stays in his room, he doesn't experience life.

These AIs are like that. They feed on human creativity. Human experience of life produces creativity. These AIs do not experience life and do not think, so they can cannot replace humans.

[–] Mereo@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 years ago

Forgot to say is when you "click" a comment in the comment section.

view more: ‹ prev next ›