So you believe Jill Stein, who has no chance of winning, but think it's absurd to believe Harris, who has a significant chance of winning? Honestly you crack me up but you're kind of annoying at this point.
That too. Cokeheads as well.
Wow a pledge! Good for Jill Stein! You're all just doing so much!
So you're too lazy/stupid to actually learn why the Green Party isn't following the rules and just settling on some bullshit rage bait, got it.
Not surprising. O&G industry is full of meatheads.
Can you answer that person's question? What tangible steps has Jill Stein taken to stop an ongoing genocide?
Am going to bed but please read my comment above. The person you responded to doesn't know what they're talking about and WI law is very clear about why the Dems are filling their complaint. Green Party can't get their shit together even with a write-in campaign.
WI state law requires that state officers like members of legislature, judges, or even candidates for the leg, be the person/people that nominates electors. The Green Party even had ample time to mount a write-in campaign for a legislative candidate for the primary that was held a couple of weeks ago, and they didn't. Dems filed a complaint the day after the primary because that's the soonest they could do it.
I don't understand how the Green Party demands to be taken seriously but then routinely breaks incredible simple to understand rules.
It's stuff like this that really annoys me about Green Party. Like really, where in WI state law does it says a party doesn't require a state officer to nominate electors? Nowhere, because it says the complete polar opposite of that and the Green Party is either being ignorant or wilfully ignorant. Personally, I don't understand how one can look at this situation and call the Dem's complaint a "dirty trick in the book of sabotage".
The fraudulent signatures are irrelevant because they exceeded the threshold, and were done by contracted third parties.
How are the fraudulent signatures irrelevant? They were obtained by a firm hired by the Green Party whose owner was convicted of election fraud in VA and is currently on trial for election fraud in MI? I find it hard to believe that the Green Party was approached by this guy (whose record is plainly available to the public), did absolutely no vetting, and entrusted him with one of the most important parts of getting their candidate on the ballot. Shawn Wilmoth, the owner of the firm contracted by the Green Party, has multiple complainants who will testify against him in the MI fraud trial-- none of which are Green Party candidates. Same with NC and every other state his firm operated in-- lots of fraud, but Green Party candidates for some strange reason never take him to court. I suspect it's because doing so would involve mutual disclosure that would reveal that the Green Party did know if Wilmoth's reputation and that's precisely why they wanted him. When you know your candidate is going to lose and you're just in it to spoil an election, who cares if there's some fallout afterwards?
Matthew Martucci, the NC SBoE’s lead investigator stated
“The Investigation Division elevated the Green Party investigation as a potentially criminal matter with high priority due to observing a pattern of petition pages submitted containing what appeared to be noticeably fraudulent signatures”
This pattern isn't mentioned anywhere in the court decision, and is part of why I question the seemingly selective omissions in the decision. Every legitimate candidate that got burned by Shawn Wilmoth is taking his ass to court, meanwhile Green Party candidates aren't taking legal action nor are they explaining to their voters why they're just letting some fraud get away with the thousands of dollars they gave him.
I mentioned this in my original comment. I think I worded my response to you poorly.
When I said "Check out my reply", I meant check out my reply below in the thread.
https://lemmy.ml/post/19841605/13414777
^ This one. What I wrote to you was my (poor) attempt at a briefer version that is missing the answer to your question-- which I did address in the above linked comment that I made to another user. The criteria used to disqualify the Green Party (X amount of fraudulent signatures in their petition to have Hoh added to the ballot) was completely disregarded by the appellate court, who took the bizarre approach of completely disregarding the blatantly fraudulent signatures and instead basically said "okay well even without the fraudulent votes, they still have enough for their candidate to qualify". This flies in the face of the original NC SBoE (state board of elections) decision and doesn't even address the root problem-- fraudulent votes, and why the NC Green Party had enough to get initially disqualified.
The other issue is that the Green Party just happened to have hired a petitioning firm that has a long history of election fraud. The owner/operator was convicted of election fraud in 2011 and in 2022 became the subject of an investigation regarding election fraud in Michigan. This was brought up by the Dems and the DSCC in their legal action and it was just inexplicably not addressed at all in court. Instead, it was just dismissed/downplayed as nothing more than a baseless political accusation.
I'm glad you responded with your comment because IMO it highlights exactly how effective the Green Party's smarmy tactics are. People understandably read the headlines and are often not aware of the missing links that can only be put together if you read several articles about the issue from different periods of time. I've been following the Matt Hoh thing from the start and I've seen the PDFs of the fraudulent signatures-- it's fucking clown show level fraud, like the kind of forged signatures you might see as an elementary school teacher from a bratty student. Personally, I don't believe for a second that the Green Party did absolutely no vetting of the petitioning firm they chose-- I think they 100% were aware of the owner's past and present election fraud and that's exactly why they chose that specific firm out of countless others with a far better reputation.
Nuance?! What is this?
Again, why do you keep dodging the fact that the Green Party blatantly failed to meet the very simple to meet rules? Like you're a grown ass adult and this is really how you respond to basic questions? Jesus christ, just pathetic. Stop wasting my time.