MediumGray

joined 2 years ago
[โ€“] MediumGray@lemmy.ca 12 points 1 year ago

Of course Anne of Green Gables is set in PEI so really it should have been set there. It would have been even funnier since they could probably outnumber the current population pretty easily if they immigrated en masse.

[โ€“] MediumGray@lemmy.ca 37 points 1 year ago

I mean, I think that's just called science

[โ€“] MediumGray@lemmy.ca 15 points 1 year ago

Well, because it financially supports scammers preying on people is why not. And many medical scams aren't harmless or innocent or may give people a false sense of wellness that can lead to them avoiding real medicine.

[โ€“] MediumGray@lemmy.ca 22 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Ya, sadly while this is cute it is not in fact true.

[โ€“] MediumGray@lemmy.ca 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yes and no. I can't speak to the particulars of this situation but differences in means matter even if they currently produce the same outcome. A toothless dog and a dog in a muzzle are different in important ways.

[โ€“] MediumGray@lemmy.ca 64 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Organic does not mean pesticide free. It just means they use so called 'organic pesticides' which are just as bad or worse, but they're 'naturally derived' which sounds better to some people. It's marketing BS. Any agricultural practice at scale uses pesticides and all produce should be washed before consumption.

[โ€“] MediumGray@lemmy.ca 8 points 2 years ago

I'm not a doctor or even well read on the subject but my understanding is that: a) it's not, and b) it's a rather different texture/stiffness.

[โ€“] MediumGray@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

If that's all you said, I agreed with that part. Why did you keep arguing with me?

I see people doing this so often (on the internet especially) and it honestly baffles me. The best I've ever been able to rationalize it is that people are often far more interested in arguing their own points and saying what they believe than actually listening to and understanding others or having a real debate. That may be overly simplistic but it's how I cope.

[โ€“] MediumGray@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

I entirely agree, and that does sound like a good approach. I just caution against presenting recycling as a solution rather than as a reduction of harm.

[โ€“] MediumGray@lemmy.ca 8 points 2 years ago (3 children)

You often can't though unfortunately. Most plastics can only be recycled a handful of times before they degrade too far. Recycling, while better than nothing, is a far more inefficient and flawed process than it is often presented as. That's why it is far better to reduce usage in the first place and reuse things as is where you can. Of course this is all still easier said than done.

view more: โ€น prev next โ€บ