MaxPower

Lol quite poetic indeed: Titanic was considered to be "unsinkable" and OceanGate's CEO said "security is a waste".

They both got a hard reality check from nature and physics.

If it really happened the way he says it did (implosion at 3,500 ft when they were travelling down to 13,000 ft) this sub was in no shape or form suited for this dive.

It's not confirmed at this point as I understand and Cameron also disclosed it as a rumor in a recent interview on Youtube.

Just read about Stockton Rush's (CEO and "pilot" of the sub, presumed dead) views about security:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stockton_Rush

It's just amazing how an aircraft pilot, a guy with an ivy-league degree in aerospace engineering can have such twisted ideas about standards, regulations, and security in general.

No way in hell would I have signed up for this haphazard dive.

I would like to know more about this person's process of gathering such information.

sechs Wochen

Juhuu, 60 Mal Bahnfahren, was gibt's da nicht zu mögen lol

Seit @lemmit.online dabei ist, der ‘All’ Feed fast zur hälfte aus Reddit Inhalten, welche ein Bot einspeißt. Das ist oft Sinnlos, da es keinen OP gibt, der wirklich auf Antworten wartet, aber vor allem versaut es das Erlebnis für Neuankömmlinge die sich umsehen, bevor sie das geblockt haben.

Nicht cool, aber ich sehe es als Experiment an. Falls es dauerhaft nicht klappt, kann man die Föderation ja kappen oder irgendwie einschränken.

Außerdem duldet @sh.itjust.works eine ‘The Donald’ Community. Dazu: https://sh.itjust.works/post/291747

Auch nicht cool, Trump ist ein Idiot und Spinner. Aber man sollte sich besser von der Vorstellung verabschieden, dass es hier zu 100% nur Inhalte gibt, mit denen man d'accord geht. Das ist glaube ich unrealistisch.

Solange es da juristisch und ethisch (Stichwort Toleranzparadoxon) nichts zu beanstanden gibt, würde ich es als OK ansehen.

I wish the world was as enthusiastic about saving hundreds of women and children as it is about saving 5 fucking millionaires or billionaires.

Thanks for that. TIL I liked "Boomer shooters".

The quote goes even further I guess:

In fact, forget about Reddit!

Correct, especially with all the dynamic loading and rendering websites nowadays do measuring in a web browser is waaay better than doing ICMP/ping requests or even httping requests.

It depends on what you are trying to measure ofc but ICMP/ping does not tell you almost anything about how fast a website is.

ping nowadays is overrated anyway. If a server responds to ICMP and how fast it does it does not really say much about "how fast" a website is. It only tells you that a) ICMP requests and responses are not blocked and b) how fast ICMP requests get answered.

That's it. It may not even tell you that a website is online because a load balancer may be responding to the ICMP request while the hosts behind it are offline.

People value ping responses way too highly.

httping may be a better tool to measure "how fast" a website is responding.

"I love the poorly educated"

They sure do. Dumb people vote for dumb candidates.

Well he threw us the gauntlet. Let's pick it up.