Mavvik

joined 2 years ago
[–] Mavvik@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 months ago (12 children)

Okay so let me be clear as to what my concerns are.

Hydrogen production, whether to be used as a fuel source or as a chemical reagent, is not problematic in isolation. However, even in this document you've linked hydrogen is being pitched largely as a green fuel source to in part replace fossil fuels in thr future. Much of the current hydrogen capacity and advance developments for hydrogen production come as a byproduct of oil and gas wells. That type of hydrogen is only considered "low carbon" because of current and potentiao future capabilities of carbon sequestration by oil and gas companies. The issues i have with carbon sequestration are a whole other story but let's just say I am also doubtful of its feasibility.

If other countries are buying our hydrogen, it's because it's cheaper than what they could potentially produce locally. If we stopped production of geological hydrogen for the purposes of reducing emissions, would it still be cheaper for other nations to import our hydrogen vs developing their own domestic production facilities? If we don't ramp down fossil fuel production, then hydrogen isn't really solving any problems and I would rather we invest money into actually decarbonizing the economy.

It just seems like to me hydrogen can either be a way to decarbonize the economy OR a way to boost economic development in canada, but I am skeptical that it can do both effectively.

[–] Mavvik@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 months ago (14 children)

I'm aware that hydrogen is useful for lots of industrial processes, but the line that is being sold for building up hydrogen capacity at a large scale is that there will be high demand for it to be used as a fuel. Besides, the same issues persist whether it's being used industrially or as a fuel, does Canada even have the domestic demand to justify a huge scale up of hydrogen production?

You are correct that I am not very knowledgeable about the hydrogen industry, which is in part why I am skeptical. My experience is limited to geology and I know that a lot of domestic hydrogen production occurs at oil and gas drilling sites, so I have been suspicious of the push for hydrogen being another greenwashing gambit by O&G companies to get more money from government to drill for more oil and gas.

I am not trying to discourage development of an industry but I don't think I'm asking unreasonable questions. If government is going to be investing a shit ton of money into this, we should be sure that it's a good investment.

[–] Mavvik@lemmy.ca 6 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (17 children)

I'm still highly skeptical that green hydrogen can be a viable export. Will it really be cheaper to do electrolysis in Canada and ship it abroad in leaky containers rather than building a solar farm or some other renewable energy source and producing hydrogen domestically? Will there even be the global demand for hydrogen to justify such a build out? I guess time will tell but I'm pretty cynical about it

[–] Mavvik@lemmy.ca 7 points 2 months ago

Haha right? It's literally a paper about core--mantle interaction and they go with "THERES GOLD IN THE CORE!" People really only care about geology when it's about finding ore deposits or oil. Except kids, kids love geology because rocks are cool. Adults need to be more like kids when it comes to science.

[–] Mavvik@lemmy.ca 7 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Not a car person (or a car owner) but this is an exciting project. I really wonder why they still have a "frunk" though. Why not go with something closer to a kei truck with the cab over the front wheels and allow a shorter wheelbase or a larger bed?

[–] Mavvik@lemmy.ca 3 points 3 months ago

Yeah, that's done in the professional organization I'm familiar with and I assume with others too

[–] Mavvik@lemmy.ca 8 points 3 months ago (2 children)

I think this is a great idea. A professional accreditation that is managed by journalists would definitely help with preventing misinformation and disinformation. Require certain number of years working under a professional journalist and an ethics exam (similar to PEng) to be a "Professional journalist". Then government can legislate rules at the recommendation of this body around whether an organization can be called a "news organization" and is protected by freedom of the press laws. This way the managing body can strip people of their professional accreditation for peddling misinformation and disinformation and general journalistic malpractice.

[–] Mavvik@lemmy.ca 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Ahhh I was wondering if this was Sudbury. I love cross-country skiing but as someone without a car in toronto, opportunities are rare. Is this Lake Laurentian conservation area? I seem to recall hearing that they have groomed trails there.

[–] Mavvik@lemmy.ca 15 points 3 months ago (6 children)

Looks great, where is this?

[–] Mavvik@lemmy.ca 6 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I like Makie #JuliaGang

[–] Mavvik@lemmy.ca 10 points 4 months ago (2 children)

The article discusses this issue specifically and provides a pretty balanced perspective on it. I don't personally blame immigration for the issues we see today and there is a compelling argument that immigration could help us out of these problems, but it really does require adequate government investment in the sectors that need labour (like healthcare)

[–] Mavvik@lemmy.ca 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

No worries, keep up the good work!

view more: ‹ prev next ›