Manticore

They're called sleepphones and yes, they're designed for side sleeping. Basically a headband with speakers. Each speaker is like a C battery, stitched into layers of felt.

The Bluetooth version has a silicon casing with a folding crease in it, to keep it flexible, but it's several inches long and doesn't seem to last long before I get whining. Idk how much of that is Bluetooth degradation vs the receiver's wear and tear from folding or being lied on. It needs regular recharging (micro USB, or i think they have a cordless charge version).

The 3.5mm has a long braided cord, has never whined, and doesn't have the chunky Bluetooth receiver. It gets charge from the phone. I always know I can use it when I want to.

Sleepphones also sells replaceable parts piecemeal so you can get just a band, just speakers, just BT unit etc.

Aww geez man, that's even worse! I learned about adapters and figured I'd at least be able to tolerate (but resent) the switch. But that will prevent me using sleeping headphones at all... :/

Definitely the jack. I have special headphones for listening to white noise while sleeping. The Bluetooth version have a chunky panel, and don't last long before they get that Bluetooth whine. That whine is a deal-breaker is a sleep aid.

So I use the 3.5mm version.... if I use the charge port converted to a Jack, I can't charge my phone while I listen to white noise and I'll wake up to 6%. Rhe loss or the jack is why I haven't upgraded my phone in years.

They were talking about the dangers of negligence. You countered with how guns can be relatively safe if one follows safety guidelines.

The 'negligence' part is referring to those that don't follow guides. By listing all the guides and rules to make guns safe, they probably mean you prove their point by showing the burden of responsibility guns require (and thus the risk when irresponsible people don't meet them).

Well, it's definitely making me gay. 🏳️‍🌈

Ngl I suspect a smaller brand using sneaky bait and switch

Hung jury =/= jury nullification.

A hung jury is no verdict at all. Its just means another trial with a new jury until a verdict is reached.

Luigi will be paraded in his jumpsuit until he is formally jailed or dies. Anything else requires everybody to agree on Not Guilty, and that's astronomically unlikely given the volume of lobbying against him.

Whether or not he did it isn't even relevant anymore. It's whether the common folk of a jury think he did, and both supporters and detractors of 'The Adjustor' consider that to be Luigi. His identity is so entangled in the public consciousness that the only way out is nullification, and prosecution is unlikely to allow such a jury to form.

Jury null requires EVERYONE on the jury to agree Not Guilty, there are plenty of sleepwalker who believe the TV narrative about basically everything, Luigi included. Won't be hard to find at least one

Edit: jury nullification IS NOT the same thing as a hung jury. The former is final. The latter means a new trial with a new jury.

You're right that you can't personally farm them, but you can still end up getting them from publics. The old relics are still operable. I have hundreds of old relics that I open as fodder, as do other regular players. And ofc trading. The surplus of old relics helps keep down trade prices because they're still trickling into the market, albeit slower.

A better example is prime accessories. These are real-money only, and can only be bought from Prime Access (when a Prime is released) or a Prime Resurgence (Prime temporarily back for sale a year or so later). Stuff like Octavia Prime's shawzin/sitar being $35 or gone for (effecively) forever.

The community is very open about warframe.market existing though. Like an auction house for player trading across all servers. So if your relics drop bad items. Sell them on the market until you can eventually buy the one you want.

Other games do thinks like soulbound/account bound stuff. Not everything in WF is tradable, but most things are

I'm tired of talking about cash and being compared to flat earthers scared of the government tracking them. Don't bring them into this, right now you're talking to me, not them. I'm begging you to listen to what I'm saying.

Retail doesnt like cash. Its annoying to handle, costs money to count and deposit. They have to have cash on hand for change, and they have to account for loss from miscounted change or poorly supervised employees scooping the till. But currently, retail has to accept cash as legal tender.

If you make society cashless, if you give businsses the right to be card only, to not handle cash; then most of them wont. You make cash almost useless.

it's not about cash being illegal. It's about businesses not being obliged to accept it.

As it is, sometimes I cover for a friend and I beg them to just pay me back with a bank deposit because if they give me $50 notes the only place I can reliably use that is the supermarket, where less and less of their self-checkout machines support cash (and if my flatmates do Click and Collect, it can't help me pay them because they don't want it either).

Or they're making me do a special trip to a bank that is barely open anymore (because most services are online-only) just so I can deposit it into something I can use for all my other online-only services.

It doesn't need to be illegal, it just won't help you.