Mane25

joined 2 years ago
[–] Mane25@feddit.uk 11 points 2 years ago (1 children)

You must've been thinking of Reddit...

[–] Mane25@feddit.uk 2 points 2 years ago

When I was religious (I'm not any more) that was something that never actually troubled me. I believed that god was benevolent but that suffering must be necessary in ways that we humans can't conceive of. Who were we to question the grander plan?

[–] Mane25@feddit.uk 11 points 2 years ago

Since science is deductive it's probably impossible to prove the negative there, but I think there's enough evidence beyond reasonable doubt that you can confidently deny it (unless your god is non-falsifiable, in which case it's not worth discussion).

[–] Mane25@feddit.uk 3 points 2 years ago

That's a good interview but what about it brought it to mind with 6.5?

[–] Mane25@feddit.uk 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Is this a reference to anything or what? I can't find the link.

[–] Mane25@feddit.uk 11 points 2 years ago

I don't get upset about people having a bit of fun, but my personal opinion is that this joke is tired and there's a standard for news stories.

[–] Mane25@feddit.uk 1 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Just as a separate follow-up comment (if you'll excuse the double posting): I'm surprised the response here has been generally so anti-smartphone so far, given that the mass-migration from Reddit to KBin/Lemmy has been characterised as a reaction to Reddit killing mobile apps.

[–] Mane25@feddit.uk 13 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Sure but Loch Ness is on the 3rd most populated island in the world, it's comprehensively explored, there's nothing newsworthy to say about it unless there was a vast oversight and that would be the head line, not the "monster".

[–] Mane25@feddit.uk 45 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (11 children)

This whole "Nessie" thing counts as mildly infuriating to me at this point. The whole loch ness monster thing was a fun thing to wonder about as child, but are people really taking it "seriously?" I'm not even sure if this article was written as a serious news story or not, it's certainly light on substantial new evidence, but then it's a BBC article not presented as satire - are we supposed to all be in on the tired joke or is there really something new and substantial there?

[–] Mane25@feddit.uk 6 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (3 children)

I only have a phone due to social pressure, it's only an absolute last resort for me. Desktop/laptop, where I can actually see everything and have a proper keyboard and shortcuts, all the way. I'm told I'm a dying breed but it amazes me how so many people can stand to use their phone as much as they do, because to me it's infuriating.

[–] Mane25@feddit.uk 3 points 2 years ago

Netscape essentially became Firefox.

[–] Mane25@feddit.uk 9 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I think a q&a is overkill, Mozilla isn't controversial in the general public consciousness.

view more: ‹ prev next ›