Nah.. assistants were able to do this before LLMs
MadhuGururajan
joined 2 years ago
Because that other stuff used to work before the company fired all of QA and local devs. Then the bugs after that were used to justify LLMs to replace the "shitty coders" that outsourcing to a sweatshop usually entails. At least with the sweatshops there was some argument to be made that the people working there either had no other choice, or a slim chance they actually cared about their output and made it so at least it would do the bare minimum.
Now that corporate wants to justify their hype and investment in AI to attract the moneyed entities, they will go to any lengths to show it actually works. Even if the Emperor has no clothes on!
oh that's a shame
I can recommend trying to connect your old printer to a raspberry Pi and seeing if linux printer drivers can prolong the life of your printer. Worth a shot keeping these beauties out of the landfill.
The incentives are for scammers.
Worthwhile to check temperatures and see if the PI is shutting off after overheating.
use
display: flex
flex-direction: column
align-items: center
on the parent container
Stackoverflow is for senior devs to clown on junior devs. It's the inverse of helping juniors.
I can't cater to everyone's needs.
Can't wait for the law to slap you in the face someday.
oh nevermind.. carry on then (Tis a joke about not wanting to touch THAT mess, in case it's not clear)
I don't know the details of the MPK. So I consider it as some kind of function that maps {process PID, DLL} => Set of UID. And by UID, I AM talking about the system level user ID. Remember that this feature is a processor level feature. So it has to be transparent to the OS (well at least, to the OS Scheduler). Hence the output of this feature should be understandable to the OS kernel. Or so I hope as the implementation details are vague till now.
sadly, most likely yes.