MachineFab812

PC for "real" gaming. Phone for casual stuff, although I'll stream better games when my connection is good enough.

Who? WHEN!? Wtf, how is this news? Please tell me that's the "Onion" part...

This paper seems to be dated 18 April, 2024. Wouldn't surprise me if its some sort of re-print, but otherwise would explain why this topic popped up in the media over the last few days. https://arxiv.org/pdf/2404.11594.pdf

For a moment, I thought the kitten at the top might be a rabbit. Rabbit tails aren't that long though, but damn, thems some long ears.

Okay, so point and laugh with me. The general direction of "Canada" will do!

I liked your other reply better, but either way I still have more to learn. ie, I had no idea what the complex plane is.

i= √(-1) = imaginary number (1^2) + (√(-1))^2 = 1 - 1 = 0 7

At least, I thought that was the idea in the OP.

Also, for your version, on a number line or Cartesian plane, the distance from -1 to 1 is 2, not 0

Found Justin Trudeau's Lemmy account y'all. Let's all point and laugh at the moron who thinks the Flipper Zero is genuinely useful for car theft!

I use ... Plex ... as a gap-filler, but I don't become aware of the gaps(in what-I-thought-I-had-subbed-and-actually-had-paid-access-to-for-years versus what-is-actually-still-available) anywhere near as quickly as each of my children.

Guess I wanted to make but didn't want to end up on another list. Relavent: Its a good thing for no-one that I'm being squeemish about lists for the first time since Scalia died.

3D effects achievable by setting your cutter at a few specific heights, and not changing height while following a 2D toolpath (generally with a mill, but you could make jigs/stencils and/or use a pantograph with a simple router). Give your owl domes for eyes and/or bevel the sides of the beak just deep enough to form a line down the middle.

An "extreme" example would be forming just the one side of your chipmunk bookend as it looks in the pic where we can also see your blue T-square, although without actual 3D toolpaths you wouldn't be able to achieve that level of detail(you could do it with a pantograph and your existing bookend though).

Mind you, a pantograph is effectively giving you fully 3D toolpaths, but your output will be either much larger or much smaller than the source object(smaller requires a smaller router bit, and larger requires more time and a more rigid setup).

Somehow, this image only seems to exist in posts with the same text, across multiple platforms. Lets hope its not a render created for this post. That would be absurd, and not in a fun way.