M0oP0o

joined 2 years ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] M0oP0o@mander.xyz 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Even someone who was a big fan of capitalism should see that seeking jail time for the crime of copying a product that is likely not even sold anymore as a defense of potential profit is wildly wrong.

[–] M0oP0o@mander.xyz 6 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

Also no? The protection of a multi national company should not be going this far.

[–] M0oP0o@mander.xyz 4 points 2 weeks ago

They where told it would be done in a few days, a massive purge. For the average rasist maga fan, it would never be enough.

[–] M0oP0o@mander.xyz 21 points 2 weeks ago

Yes I read it. Its fucking bleak, jail for buying something with a ROM on it. Pathetic actions.

[–] M0oP0o@mander.xyz 1 points 2 weeks ago

Hmmm, I guess it depends on how good the sales team is selling the new PCs. The line would be tpm on the board I guess, but after working in the industry I know that would not stop a sales team from having them replaced.

I would assume that you can get a workstation from about 4 or 5 years ago in general.

[–] M0oP0o@mander.xyz 3 points 2 weeks ago

Wild thing about this line of argument is that it almost solely comes out of american mouths, you know the place that pays more per capita then anyother nation on health care.

[–] M0oP0o@mander.xyz 4 points 2 weeks ago
[–] M0oP0o@mander.xyz 4 points 2 weeks ago

I fear unless something is done that Carney will go down in history as a modern day Chamberlain.

[–] M0oP0o@mander.xyz 9 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Our government is failing in their responsiblity on this. Makes my blood boil that they still are walking on eggshells with the us.

[–] M0oP0o@mander.xyz 3 points 2 weeks ago

I hope they become locked in reliveing eating their best meal of their life.

[–] M0oP0o@mander.xyz 12 points 2 weeks ago

This is somehow worse, the "let them eat cake" was said from a very out of touch person who just did not understand. While this is comming from someone who willingly is going out of their way to blame the peasants for the actions that they are doing to those same peasants.

[–] M0oP0o@mander.xyz 8 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Ozempic is such a wild thing. Who knows how it will effect people in 20 years (it is not approved for weight loss after all).

I keep getting brain candy vibes from its increasing use. (Good movie FYI)

379
Gourmet Rule (slrpnk.net)
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by M0oP0o@mander.xyz to c/aboringdystopia@lemmy.world
 

cross-posted from: https://slrpnk.net/post/8485106

Definitely has nothing to do with sky-rocketing food prices in our capitalist hellscape.

Looking for the original link still.....

Edit, found it:

https://www.businessinsider.com/millennials-gen-z-splurge-groceries-spending-inflation-gen-z-boomers-2024-4

 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/13942559

(water is wet and fire is hot).

 
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/13793832

Layla Ahmed is, by any measure, a responsible adult. She works at a nonprofit in Nashville helping refugees. Makes 50k a year. Saves money. Pays her bills on time.

But there’s another measure of adulthood that has so far eluded her. Ahmed, 23, moved back in with her parents after graduating college in 2022. 

“There is a perception that those who live with their parents into their 20s are either bums or people who are not hard-working,” she told the Today, Explained podcast.

Being neither of those things, Ahmed and her situation actually point to a growing trend in America right now: More adults, especially younger adults, are either moving back in with family or never leaving at all. 

According to the Pew Research Center, a quarter of all adults ages 25 to 34 now live in a multigenerational living situation (which it defines as a household with two or more adult generations). 

It’s a number that’s been creeping upward since the early ‘70s but has swung up precipitously in the last 15 years. The decennial US Census measures multigenerational living slightly differently (three or more generations living together), but the trend still checks out. From 2010 to 2020, there was a nearly 18 percent increase in the number of multigenerational households.

 

Title is prompt in the bingilator

 

cross-posted from: https://mander.xyz/post/11235723

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/13576449

The company, Tuff Torq, was fined nearly $300,000 for hiring 10 children. It must also set aside $1.5 million to help the immigrant minors who were illegally employed.

Immigrant children as young as 14 were found working illegally amid dangerous heavy equipment at a Tennessee firm that makes parts for lawn mowers sold by John Deere and other companies, according to Labor Department officials.

The company, Tuff Torq, was fined nearly $300,000 for hiring 10 children. As part of a consent agreement with the federal government, the company is also required to set aside $1.5 million to help the children who were illegally employed. Ryan Pott, general counsel for Tuff Torq’s majority owner, the Japanese firm Yanmar, acknowledged the violations to NBC News.

 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/13576449

The company, Tuff Torq, was fined nearly $300,000 for hiring 10 children. It must also set aside $1.5 million to help the immigrant minors who were illegally employed.

Immigrant children as young as 14 were found working illegally amid dangerous heavy equipment at a Tennessee firm that makes parts for lawn mowers sold by John Deere and other companies, according to Labor Department officials.

The company, Tuff Torq, was fined nearly $300,000 for hiring 10 children. As part of a consent agreement with the federal government, the company is also required to set aside $1.5 million to help the children who were illegally employed. Ryan Pott, general counsel for Tuff Torq’s majority owner, the Japanese firm Yanmar, acknowledged the violations to NBC News.

 
 

Someone told me to run "half asleep and drooling" in the bingilator.

a lot of sad dogs later...

 

cross-posted from: https://programming.dev/post/10891020

See title - very frustrating. There is no way to continue to use the TV without agreeing to the terms. I couldn't use different inputs, or even go to settings from the home screen and disconnect from the internet to disable their services. If I don't agree to their terms, then I don't get access to their new products. That sucks, but fine - I don't use their services except for the TV itself, and honestly, I'd rather by a dumb TV with a streaming box anyway, but I can't find those anymore.

Anyway, the new terms are about waiving your right to a class action lawsuit. It's weird to me because I'd never considered filing a class action lawsuit against Roku until this. They shouldn't be able to hold my physical device hostage until I agree to new terms that I didn't agree at the time of purchase or initial setup.

I wish Roku TVs weren't cheap walmart brand sh*t. Someone with some actual money might sue them and sort this out...

EDIT: Shout out to @testfactor@lemmy.world for recommending the brand "Sceptre" when buying my next (dumb) TV.

EDIT2: Shout out to @0110010001100010@lemmy.world for recommending LG smart TVs as a dumb-TV stand in. They apparently do require an agreement at startup, which is certainly NOT ideal, but the setup can be completed without an internet connection and it remembers input selection on powerup. So, once you have it setup, you're good to rock and roll.

 

Had extras not suited for the challenge:

view more: ‹ prev next ›