Basically yeah. Spread and grow.
But metastasized cancer is much harder to get rid of, and that's what Russia has ensured on happening.
Basically yeah. Spread and grow.
But metastasized cancer is much harder to get rid of, and that's what Russia has ensured on happening.
Of course those countries had issues - including the USA.
But it's Russia that interfered enough to put the far right in those countries in power. Like I said, they poured gasoline on what was already a fire
Yeah, the younger ones don't remember all the dystopic shit under Thatcher. Sure analog cameras in every corner isn't as effective as AI monitoring 24/7, but it's not like the intention was different.
The Argentine peso crashed and then stayed down. That's actually a sign of stability, because it's remaining at a constant, not jumping up and down wildly.
It didn't crash only to go back to original value to the decrease by half and undulate like a wave, like Bitcoin and other crypto does.
Many are asking the same here
To bring it back to relevancy, I wonder how many white people were in Epstein's files
This poll needs a "depends" option.
I don't, but if something in the comments seem off (or the title of the post does) then I do. So it's about 50/50. I also usually browse All though.
That's why I think exclusionary communities should have their own instance - makes it easier to control postings and such. Especially since seeing the rules isn't always intuitive in GUIs such as Voyager.
But many more civil wars.
Though now that poverty isn't as bad there, not sure if there'll be another. Then again, the French burning cities is as constant as Salvadorians going to war with their government.
Too bad the fucking USA keeps intervening.
after learning that in China 200 years ago people used non-uniform money, that is, all kinds of coins, some literally ancient still in circulation, and somehow that worked
I'm talking about valuation pegged paper money, not hard value currency. This old strawman is getting old too.
The coins worked because they were still tangible material with assigned value (ie metals value by weight or marking).
The local bank paper money was different, and pegged to hard value materials (gold standard).
Cryptocurrency works like the second because, like the paper money, crypto doesn't have inherent tangible value (technically even less than paper since it's completely intangible).
It doesn't work like the fucking Chinese coins (which, btw, still relied on a very centralized government existing anyway) because you can't hold or do anything with 0s and 1s, nor can you physically keep it around.
Yeah, because the last time humans tried decentralized money it also caused a ton of problems.
Bitcoin and other cryptocurrency isn't inventing anything new, it's just doing the same old localized bank notes system again, but with computers™
Even if crypto had any actual physical value, and solved the stability problems, lack of inflation, etc, it would still end up having control issues, because those already wealthy in a lot of it could manipulate the value easily by simply exchanging it or dumping it.
So basically you'd just end up with the problems of current currencies + all the problems crypto has, which were the same problems localized notes had 200 or so years as well.
You mean all crashes then? The 3 that have happened in over ONE HUNDRED YEARS?
You can't be fucking serious to compare that fluctuation with Bitcoin's