Lifter

joined 2 years ago
[–] Lifter@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yes but I find all this both racist and sexist. Not all men in India are creeps, even if may be a rampant problem. Shouldn't they instead try to punish the weirdos?

[–] Lifter@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 year ago (3 children)

How about "we let private companies segregate in whichever ways they want!"?

[–] Lifter@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The market would open wide for filling aeevices, where you bring your own reusable bottle. Also, water should be free and not put in bottles at all.

It's unfair to blame capitalism when the state obviously failed (even if through lobbying) to deliver clean water. Other countries have no such problems. Water is basically free where I live.

We have huge taxes on single use bags, and more taxes are coming.

[–] Lifter@discuss.tchncs.de 8 points 1 year ago

Forcing Russia to defend so they can't be on the offense any more.

[–] Lifter@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Why is the soul in the mind?

I recognize the weird state that would exist where the mind is fully copied into the ghost, having two entities with the same mind.

I still think that would be interesting fiction though.

[–] Lifter@discuss.tchncs.de 8 points 1 year ago

Their income is right on the median you posted. Is that upper middle class?

Also, they filed together. Does the data count per household or per person? Where I'm from, we pay tax individually.

I'm just as confused as before...

[–] Lifter@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

To some people it is.

[–] Lifter@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 1 year ago

I totally agree with you. I'm not sure that strategy works though. All they will (still) see is 0% linux/firefox users no matter if we spoof or not. It will just be fewer users.

[–] Lifter@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Or just kill the poor people by sending them to any meaningless war. /s

[–] Lifter@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 1 year ago

It's actually the company's problem. They usually opt to add more debt though, rather that wade through the old stuff.

In the end, all software sucks and should be replaced as soon as possible. Code quality is a lie we tell ourselves so that we can sometimes be proud of our work. It's usually the code we are most proud of that is the worst. Design patterns everywhere making the vode overly convoluted and "future proof". The only future proofing that happens is that no-one will understand it, so they won't change it. Trying to design for the future usually makes it harder in the future.

view more: ‹ prev next ›