LibsEatPoop

joined 5 years ago
[–] LibsEatPoop@hexbear.net 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] LibsEatPoop@hexbear.net 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

I have quite a few!

You should start with Dreams from My Father. It's a bit older, but it's a classic. From there, you go directly to The Audacity of Hope (ooh that title!). And the trio is completed by the latest of this author, published quite recently in fact, A Promised Land.

But, we are feminists. It's not enough to just read men. We also need to read women! In fact, forget the men. Forget the books I recommended above. I have another trilogy, a BETTER trilogy! Hard Choices, My Own Words and Becoming.

Also, we socialists have amazing music.

[–] LibsEatPoop@hexbear.net 6 points 1 year ago (3 children)

cowritten by Leigh Phillips.

Are they bad?

[–] LibsEatPoop@hexbear.net 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah, I don't agree with all the points. And, as I said, I haven't read the literature on "degrowth" (I do have Saito's books, haven't gotten around to it). I was specifically interested in what the writers claimed were Saito's wrongful reinterpretations of Marx on things like historical materialism, and a new break in his thinking similar to the young and old Marx, etc etc. It's always so fascinating to me, how Marxists (and other leftists ofc) build such competing and conflicting theories arising from the same foundation, often using the same works.

[–] LibsEatPoop@hexbear.net 74 points 1 year ago (8 children)

Don't forget the submarine controlled by a discount Xbox controller.

[–] LibsEatPoop@hexbear.net 2 points 1 year ago

Well, I got into them when I was younger. My school required a MacBook and when I started using one, I found it way cooler than my clunky Windows laptop. Part of that was probably the price, but it was also the OS. It was really smooth - and I freaking fell in love with the touchpad gestures. Then I got an iPhone, an iPad etc.

Overtime, I moved away from an Apple only ecosystem. Now I use Linux on an XPS. I also use a Galaxy Tab instead - iPad, while powerful, is really hampered by its OS. Galaxy Tab is far more powerful and capable of being an actual laptop replacement, at least for me.

But I still use an iPhone. I find it a lot easier to deal with than Android. I tried the latter in the past, btw. But I don't need customization on my phone, unlike with my laptop or tablet. So, for my headphones, I got the AirPods. The connection between the iPhone and AirPods is really good.

Will my next phone be an iPhone. I dunno. There are some really interesting Android phones out there, and the platform seems more mature now with many companies offering a simple UI that doesn't do too much - I still keep up with it all. I liked the OnePlus Fold that came out recently, for example.

I'll admit, I'm not your average Apple user. I made a very deliberate choice to not be tied down to Apple. I've taken conscious actions to have different OSes and software on different devices and not be locked down by any one company. I use FOSS wherever I can, and moved away from all the default apps pushed by Apple, Samsung etc. long ago. It's also why I won't get a Galaxy phone - I already have the tablet. The only concession I allowed was the AirPods.

But I can tell you another example. Over the years, my father has needed new products. And every time I've gotten him Apple products. Now, he has an all Apple setup. MacBook, iPad, iPhone, AirPods. Why? Because I've seen him use Windows laptops and Android phones in the past. I know just how many problems he's had with them - and how much I had to help him with them. Now that he has an all Apple set up, everything is dead simple for him. People underestimate this.

Hope this helps answer your questions.

[–] LibsEatPoop@hexbear.net 59 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (17 children)

LMAO FUCKING BASED.

LETS GOOOOOOOO

Edit - Look at the cope in the replies.

Edit 2 - THERE IS A R/CONSPIRACY THREAD With 100s of comments.

[–] LibsEatPoop@hexbear.net 69 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Atleast the replies and quotes are 90% good. Still the occasional anti-Russia shill in there. but damn. No matter how anti-communist Putin is, and under him Russia has become ussr-cry , at least they still hate Nazis. Can't say the same for any Western country (other than Ireland I guess).

[–] LibsEatPoop@hexbear.net 8 points 1 year ago

Yeah, the person you're replying to is just wrong.

Firstly, we're talking specifically about West Bank settlements. No point shifting the discussion into the whole of Israel (where they are also wrong - it is a settler colonial project. There is no debate to be had about that. There can be a debate about what to do with the people living there currently, but not with the fact that it is one).

Destiny and Omar have a disagreement on human's "being illegal". This is preposterous. One of the primary objections decent people have to the framing is that fact that humans aren't illegal. We aren't fucking property. We are sentient, living, breathing, self-conscious creatures. Calling humans illegals is dehumanizing, no different from any other term used in our recent past. Everyone knows illegal immigration occurs, and many liberals like to say they want to increase legal immigration and make it easier to attain citizenship. That's a separate fucking topic - the people who come in legally are richer, more well educated, tend to be from whiter and model minority communities (and I'm not even getting into the intra-Asian racism and schisms here - look into the difference between which Asian people tend to actually be "model minorities" and which do not, i.e. who actually earn high incomes, immigrate legally etc. and who do not).

The fact that Destiny and this fan of his use the term so willingly is proof that they do not consider immigrants as fully humans, they refuse to fully empathize with them - and this proven by the statement "illegal immigration shouldn't be happening". This statement is just thrown in there with no explanation, no justification, just assuming people will agree with it. No. Why should "illegal immigration" not be happening? What's wrong with it? Who are these people? Why are they immigrating? What forces them to come in illegally? What forces them to stay illegally? None of that is examined, because they are not humanized - no, they broke the law, they are "illegal", they are not worthy of our empathy.

I hate this shit.

Finally, the third paragraph. Omar absolutely does not apply the standard selectively. This goes back to my previous reply. Destiny and this fan have completely confused (I'd say deliberately) immigration and settler colonialism (see that whole reply) and use it to push this narrative. They are the ones using this false dichotomy to push this agenda of equating a violent, state-led and capitalist-backed project of settler-colonialism to intensely human desire of desperate people, seeking a better, safer life for themselves and their families, often due to America and its cronies.

Final point, it's not about fucking optics. Jesus christ. It's about human beings, not internet debates.

[–] LibsEatPoop@hexbear.net 12 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Well, thank you for trying I guess. If you wanna keep it up, you can try "immigrants aren't the same as settlers backed by a violent settler colonial state - the state is illegal; humans are not." but I doubt that would work.

The logic I'm trying to use is that the state, in this case, Israel, but in the past, America, Canada and other settler colonial states, are illegal in their attempts to colonize, displace, and genocide the native populations of the land (whether the laws of the time reflect that or not - even then, Israel's West Bank settlements are still illegal). And morally, there is a difference between "illegal immigrants" crossing borders made by these settler colonial states vs. these settlers taking over indigenous land with the backing of a violent state apparatus.

Like, Omar's statement, "no humans are illegal" can even apply to the Israelis in the West Bank provided there is no backing (no state/private funding, no military/police protection) of those settlers and it isn't accompanied by the simultaneous denial of that statement (no humans are illegal i.e. worth living, protecting) to the Palestinians living in West Bank. This is clearly not the case. There is a double standard here, i.e. apartheid. That's why comparing West Bank settlements to immigrant in the US or other countries is a false dichotomy.

[–] LibsEatPoop@hexbear.net 17 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Ask that Destiny fan now what they think of their daddy’s comment.

 

Goddamn is long covid scary.

 

china leading the world in battery-swapping technology.

 

(dunk tank for the alt-right youtuber, not the OP who collected the information and posted it)

TLDR: 14/88 memes, Hitler's b'day memes, Tucker Carlson watch parties, and following Proud Boys and Libs of Tiktok.

Never was that big into Internet Historian, but I guess I'll remove the few videos I had in my watch later and tell youtube to stop recc'ing the channel now.

Whew. I guess you either go the idubbbz route and apologize/repent for all your past edginess and denounce that version of you and all the fans who still hold on to it or you become a nazi.

Well, there is a third option. You could be like H3 and seem all progressive and reformed till Israel starts genociding kids and then its "wat about hummus tho" and both-siding it till you've purged the leftist audience you were trying to build.

Can you tell I'm disappointed and still bitter?

 

TLDR: EU wants to force companies to trust all certificate agencies on all browsers even if they are meddling and reading all your internet traffic.

 

Teen Vogue continues to be awesome.

Henry Kissinger was one of the US empire's proudest, most prolifically murderous foot soldiers.

On November 29, former US Secretary of State Henry Kissinger, who NPR calls “one of the country's most important foreign policy thinkers for more than half a century,” died at 100. Kissinger was responsible for an estimated 3 to 4 million deaths... and millions of human rights violations .... recalled by Yale historian Greg Grandin in his obituary of Kissinger for The Nation: “Cambodia, Laos, Vietnam, East Timor, Bangladesh, against the Kurds, in Chile, Argentina, Uruguay, and Cyprus, among other places.”

In May, Grandin wrote ... about Kissinger making it to age 100, outliving his contemporaries who share some of the blame, like Richard Nixon. That month, MSNBC commentator Medhi [sic] Hasan “celebrated” Kissinger’s birthday by recalling “some of the many, many people around the world who didn’t get to live till 100, or even 60, 70 or 80, because of Henry Kissinger, because of his support for brutal dictators, brutal regimes, brutal wars, and war crimes.”

Kissinger’s... political career launched by steering US foreign policy through the Vietnam and Cold Wars, using, as Grandin put it, “bombs as an instrument of diplomacy” — an approach which, HuffPost’s obituary observed, “has become a hallmark of US foreign policy.”

In the 1970s, Kissinger was partially responsible for right-wing coup d’etats and government overthrows in Latin America, including Chile and Argentina.

The Intercept’s obituary said Kissinger “stoked a war in Angola and prolonged apartheid in South Africa."

Upon news of Kissinger's death, the internet celebrated possibly more than it did after the last elderly imperial death.... Joshua Hill posted a video from the 2010s of Kissinger being “unrepentant” about the deaths of Cambodians, where Kissinger’s personally approved carpet-bombing campaign still wounds and takes lives from cluster bombs left there more than 50 years later. (The US provided the same sort of bombs to Ukraine this year.) C-SPAN posted footage from 2016 of Kissinger defending his role in Vietnam. A biting missive from the late Anthony Bourdain... got posted over and over again.

Within 10 minutes of seeing the news, I started seeing the headlines: “America’s Most Notorious War Criminal” dead, a Teen Vogue classic; “Controversial Diplomat;” and some spicier ones, such as “Finally” at the leftist Tribune. Publishers Verso and Jacobin had a book fully prepared and ready for a print run for the occasion. It’s hard to exaggerate how long the media had to get ready for this moment. A contributor to the New York Times’s obituary died in 2010.

Apparently, the preparedness to dance on Kissinger's grave went hand-in-hand with an assumption, proven right, that those currently in power wouldn’t hesitate to eulogize a war criminal. Eric Adams and George W. Bush are among those publicly mourning. In life, Kissinger was a friend to Hillary Clinton, an advisor to Trump, and feted by the Obama administration in 2016 — at the same time that Obama acknowledged the US’s role in Argentina’s “dirty war” against dissenters and leftists.

Kissinger has advised or been celebrated by every presidency since he joined Nixon’s cabinet, though less so with President Biden. However, current Secretary of State Anthony Blinken, whose name has been sprawled across coverage of America’s 2023 involvement in overseas wars, attended Kissinger’s 100th-birthday party at the New York Public Library...

New York City’s social strata was a respite for Kissinger, according to New York magazine’s Choire Sicha, who noted that from 1977 onward — when... “in all the world there were fewer names more hated than his” — he left his academic and diplomatic careers behind to attend socialite parties after his campaign of death.

“Historical memory is short, and US politicians from both parties have a habit of bestowing accolades and kind words on officials who deserve nothing of the sort,” wrote Azadeh Shahshahani for Teen Vogue in 2021 following the death of fellow war criminal Donald Rumsfeld, calling for accountability for both Rumsfeld and Kissinger. Shahshahani pointed out that, in 1971, in Bangladesh alone, Kissinger had enabled the deaths of between 300,000 and 3 million people by providing arms to the Pakistani Army.

Ultimately, there’s little to celebrate about a war criminal who lived without regret to 100 years old, comfortably admired by the political class that created and supported him, with millions of deaths in his tracks. I’m reminded of a lyric: “Not everybody gets the chance to live/A life that isn't dangerous.”

Our tech overlords, modern-day robber barons with hubris and unchecked power, aspire to never age, never die, to outlive us on other planets rather than save ours. There’s not much dignity left in the “lesser evil” that is folks gladly burning our planet to the ground in favor of supposed American business interests. Things are dark right now. But, as writer Edward Ongweso Jr. tweeted, “At least one less literal demon walks among us.”

While death tolls keep rising over the world at the hands or arms of the US empire, to outlive one of its proudest, prolifically murderous foots soldiers offers some small karmic comfort.

158
China Did A Cringe. (hexbear.net)
submitted 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) by LibsEatPoop@hexbear.net to c/news@hexbear.net
 

Link

AI have no rights. Your AI creations are right-less. They belong in the public domain. If not, they are properties of the peoples whose art you stole to make the AI.

 

Been doomscrolling r/worldnews sometimes cuz reading their takes on Israel-Palestine is a form of self-harm. Then, go cleanse myself on r/news which has been somewhat decent surprisingly. But each time I also glance at headlines at the “other” war where it seems like Ukraine’s doing pretty well?

Anyone have good sources to follow and keep up to date on it?

 

Best platform fr.

TikTok has come under GOP fire in recent weeks after the app showed an apparent spike in pro-Palestine content after the IDF began its bombing campaign of Gaza following Hamas’s Oct. 7 attack. Republican politicians have publicly claimed that the company is intentionally promoting pro-Palestine content with the goal of “brainwashing our [American] youth” into supporting Hamas. In an essay penned for the Free Press, Representative Mike Gallagher of Wisconsin wrote that TikTok was “controlled by America’s foremost adversary, one that does not share our interests or our values: the Chinese Communist Party (CCP),” and that the “rampant pro-Hamas propaganda on the app should serve as a wake-up call to Americans” to ban it. Gallagher wrote that promoting “pro-Hamas” content is something the CCP would do, because two Chinese web platforms that have mapping capabilities do not label Israel on their maps, and that this form of censorship should come as “no surprise.”

But the proliferation of pro-Palestine content on TikTok isn’t due to the app’s algorithm, the company stated in a press release on Monday. Rather, it claimed that teenagers simply tend to support Palestine more. “Attitudes among young people skewed toward Palestine long before TikTok existed,” the release stated. “Support for Israel (as compared to sympathy for Palestine) has been lower among younger Americans for some time. This is evidenced by looking at Gallup polling data of millennials dating as far back as 2010, long before TikTok even existed.” The data linked by the release states that sympathy toward Israel is “solidly positive” among older generations, but that millennials were “evenly divided,” with 42 percent sympathizing more with Palestine and 40 percent sympathizing more with Israel.

The company wrote in the release that its algorithm does not “take sides,” but operates in a positive feedback loop—the more of a certain type of content a user interacts with, the more of that type of content they will be shown. “TikTok does not ‘promote’ one side of an issue over another,” the release read. “In the U.S., we have given our third-party Trusted Technology Provider access to TikTok source code to understand if the system is acting as TikTok intends…On TikTok, the videos people view, like, and share inform the recommendation algorithm about content they might find relevant. Using these signals, the recommendation algorithm creates a prediction score to rank videos to potentially recommend.” The effective thrust of TikTok’s blog post, then, is that young people are seeing more pro-Palestine content on the app because that’s what they’re engaging with.

The post also denied allegations that the company was intentionally boosting pro-Palestine hashtags to get more views. “Blunt comparisons of hashtags is severely flawed and misrepresentative of the activity on TikTok,” the release stated. “Hashtags on the platform are created and added to videos by content creators, not TikTok. Millions of people in regions such as the Middle East and South East Asia account for a significant proportion of views on hashtags. Therefore, there’s more content with #freepalestine and #standwithpalestine and more overall views. It is easy to cherry pick hashtags to support a false narrative about the platform.”

The release also noted that simply counting the number of videos associated with a hashtag was not “sufficient context” for understanding the platform. Though the #standwithIsrael tag is associated with fewer videos than #freePalestine, the release said, it has 68 percent more views per video in the U.S. Additionally, the release states, the #freePalestine tag is much older than #standwithIsrael. “Some hashtags are newer (e.g. #standwithIsrael) while others are more established (e.g. #freePalestine),” the release stated. “The vast majority (9 in 10) of videos tagged #standwithIsrael were posted in the last 30 days in the US. A difference in views and posts is expected.”

At time of writing, the #freepalestine tag has 25.5 billion views, and #standwithisrael has 440.4 million views.

 

goddamn scary shit. I considered ozempic but didn’t go for it cuz I’m a scaredy cat, despite many supposed experts online saying it’s perfectly safe.

 

Nice short video (4 mins) explaining "how to" bribe a politician, going over the three laws that make it possible and when/how they came to be.

TLDR: You can only give $5k to a candidate, directly or via a group (i.e. PAC). But you can give as much money as you want to a group/company that is not directly affiliated with the candidate. That group (a Super PAC) can spend as much money as it wants to support the candidate in any way - ads, posters, pamphlets etc. Thus, bribery is legal in the US as long as it's not direct.

view more: ‹ prev next ›