Libb

joined 1 month ago
[–] Libb@piefed.social 3 points 8 hours ago

I would be more concerned eating the bed, personally ;)

[–] Libb@piefed.social 15 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (1 children)

When they think the other must but faultless/flawless.

My spouse and I have been together for almost 30 years and counting. And neither of us are perfect, nor saint. I even less.

What screams 'this couple could last' to us is when we see people using the same method we use to face issues. Discussing the issues as quickly it arises instead of blaming and being judgmental. And that can include cheating.

In short it's keeping in mind we both can be (and probably are more often than we think) assholes or absolute morons. And that shit can happen n,o matter how hard we try.

[–] Libb@piefed.social 3 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

what about the phones in people's pockets that could be recording and the security cameras inside buildings?

People are not supposed to be recording every thing all the time. But that's a valid point you're making as that trend is changing: cc cameras are everywhere and, well, people seem obsessed with the idea of recording (and sharing) every single thing they do (I'm surprised there is not pooping social networks... as it's one thing all people have in common ;). So, I would say, it depends people, the place they're in, and its policy.

Say, our personal place has no camera and no recording at all (no smart shit either, not even smart light bulbs or smart doorbell). And when we invite people they can be assured there will be no recording as we would not allow anyone to record anything without asking our (and anyone else present) explicit permission. And if anyone would not agree with that choice, well you know: our home, our rules—they would get kicked out of our home as quickly as needed which may already have happened maybe.

It also depends the laws in your country. here in Europe (I live in France), with the GDRP we can count on a relative level of privacy: people are not supposed to be sharing any picture of a person without their consent. But in reality that is very relative and very... subject to not persist much longer, as surveillance of every move and of every word of their citizens, sorry, I meant to say ' the protection of the children' is our representatives latest excuse to screw us a little more and to deprive everyone of a little more of their rights. I imagine they have not asked for thought control (to make sure some hidden pervert has no dirty thought when seeing a little children in the street or on the TV) just because the technology is not here, not yet.

Imho, what matters the most is to keep reminding (or teaching) people around us that there is no need to record absolutely everything they do or every place they go to. And that there is such a thing as intimacy and privacy.

[–] Libb@piefed.social 2 points 12 hours ago

I've limited myself to 3 inks... most of the time ;)

Platinum Carbon Black and DeAtramentis Document Brown (these two are waterproof inks) and the basic Waterman Blue (the same ink I used to learn handwriting when I was a little kid in school, in the 70s)

[–] Libb@piefed.social 5 points 13 hours ago (2 children)

There is virtually no way to meet like-minded people who live near me because there just aren't enough people or communities on there. Even on Lemmy (which I know isn't totally private, but still beats Reddit) doesn't have the volume needed to come across a lot of people who live near me. I want to meet people. I want to have friends in real life.

I don't live in an urban planner's utopia. I live in a car-dependent suburb on the outskirts of a city. You can't just walk outside and meet a bunch of people, not with all of the "get off my lawn" types everywhere. You have to go somewhere else to meet people.

I hate to say it, but I don't see how it's feasible to meet up with normal people without some corporation or the government finding out where you're going and who you're associated with, at least not in the U.S. where I live.

Meeting people IRL (normal or not normal people, whatever that means) is how it is done. Without depending on any app, corporation or government. As a matter of fact, it is how those two started being a thing: people met and started doing things together and realized things would be even simpler if they formalized things and established some common rules.

Also, the first smartphone dates back from around 2007. That was 18 years ago. And there was no 'app' to speak of with that 1st smartphone, there was not even an app store to install apps from (this would take a few more releases before it was introduced). Do you think, not living in big crowded cities, people could not meet before 2007? ;)

Meeting people IRL is simple, and it is still free and legal to do it privately (for the time being at least). But it can also be frightening when all you're used to is 'apps'.

Like you said you have to go somewhere, anywhere you fancy, on feet or by car, public transit, whatever. The idea being to go where other 'like-minded' people are.

What will help (a lot) is to have some common interest, hobby or activity that you can use as a motivation. Say, participate in the town meetings, go to the church (no matter what one thinks about religion it's still a a way to meet people from your community), go pick a book at the local library.

And repeat it. Regularly. So, other people will start noticing you. So you will start noticing other people and a conversation can start. Just people together.

Hobbies are another great way to meet people IRL.

I like playing chess and watercolors (and books), DIY. But it could be anything.

Games? Find a local place where people meet to play board games. There is none? Go the public library and see with the librarian if they know anyone that would be interested to start such a club with you. Librarians will often a lot of people. The smae with, say, knitting, or photography, reading, writing, running,...

It's only very recently people decided they needed an app and, could it really be a coincidence, it is around the same time it has become so hard for younger people to meet people irl.

[–] Libb@piefed.social 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Well, for whatever I have the choice of not using it I will not be using it anymore. It's not worth it.

Disclaimer: for the last few years I've started limiting my online activities and have been doing it a lot more drastically for the last couple years. So, it won't come as huge change as far as I'm concerned.

[–] Libb@piefed.social 1 points 1 day ago (3 children)

C'est pas considéré comme de la haute trahison ça, en Suisse?

[–] Libb@piefed.social 2 points 1 day ago (5 children)

Bonne fête, mais n'abusez pas de l'emmental!

[–] Libb@piefed.social 8 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Being nit-picky about the paper and writing instrument I use.

If I've gotten better in regard to paper selection, I still own way too much fountain pens, (mechanical-)pencils, ballpoint pens, and so on.

[–] Libb@piefed.social 5 points 2 days ago

I don't remember.

Seriously. I'm almost 60 and I only remember when I turned 20 (I was studying and working hard, and there was that bright future waiting for me, or so I thought) and when I turned 40 (I was already bald and if I did manage to get a career it was also the year my spouse and I decided we had to get out of that crazy stupid endless race called 'a career' and try to live a much simpler, and much less shiny, life ;)

[–] Libb@piefed.social 19 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

the rules are clearly presented. either youre not paying attention or youre just an asshole who purposefully throws their opinion in a place explicitly not wanting it.

what the fuck is wrong with you guys?

The same as with those women wanting to get in this men space? I wonder...

More seriously, you ask a legit question (as it would be legit if it was a man asking why some women so badly want to join in men-only spaces), a question that could trigger an interesting discussion, but why does it have to be so fucking angry? (See how poorly it passes?)

[–] Libb@piefed.social 7 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

I actually used to pay for YouTube Premium for quite a while. It was $7/month and I split it with someone so it cost me $3/month to eliminate the very slightly annoying ads, which was well worth it.

I could have written that. I was fine with paying for YT, even though they asked too much to my taste I paid for years, but I decided their attitude was way too hostile (and too dumb) and decided to cancel my Premium membership.

I watch a lot less YT nowadays, like a lot, and I do it on Waterfox with those extensions: uBO + SponsorBlock (and YT Enhancer). So far, beside a few slow downs and the occasional refusal to play a video, it seems to be working fine.

 

I'm afraid, my post may not respect rule #2 as in reality it's a multi-purpose tool but one that can only single task too. Allow me to explain ;)

I take all my notes (and drafts absolutely everything) using a pen(cil) and paper, either in a pocket notebook or in a custom-made A5/A6 notebook (nothing fancy but if you're curious its latest iteration is visible here, the post in French but the photos should suffice).

I love this setup a lot more than I ever liked writing on a computer/device. I've been using a computer since de early 80s and I'm a decent typist, most of what I write will end up in a digital form of some sort so it's not like I'm a Luddite. It's just that I prefer the unrivaled tranquility of the pen/paper combo, it's incomparable portability, and both it's slowness and unrivaled speed.

  • No distractions, no notifications. No ads. No Fomo.
  • No tracking or spying either.
  • No batteries, no upgrades, no updates, and no crashes.
  • It's sturdy as it can withstand me sitting on it (my pocket notebook is often stored in my jeans back pocket). Heck, even if I teared my notebook to pieces I could probably still use it ;)
  • It works well under the sun, when the weather is as hot as a politician's promises of much better tomorrows, or when it's as cold as a banker's heart (when it's that cold, a pencil is probably the better choice compared to fountain pen or a ballpoint pen). And it can be used when it's raining too.

But how can it be slow and fast at the same time? If you can touch type, writing longhand is slower. I'm not a pro typist but I type much faster than I trace words on paper, even in cursive. But this slowness is also a great opportunity to not rush things. And then, that slowness is apparent only because, along the years, I've devised my very own shorthand that makes it so I can write longhand at least as quick as I can type. Plus I can freely mix words and quick sketches using the same pen/notebook.

It's a highly focused tool that beyond its apparently very limited capacity—it can do a single thing at a time only, and it has no CPU and no RAM to speak of... beside the very little that sit between my ears, I mean—that can still do a lot of very different things:

  • writing: todo, errands, ideas, fictions, poetry, a love letter, or just an address. And so on.
    *drawing/sketching. Depending the paper, one can also do watercolors or gouaches.
  • Do some math.
  • play games.
  • Quickly draw a map/plan to go some place.
  • keep info you need,
  • It can also be used to share info... by removing a sheet of paper (say, the love letter you just wrote) and give it to someone (no that was not how it all started for little kid-me back then when I was sending love notes on pages, whose pages I teared of my composition notebook, to my sweetheart while we were both very intensively not listening to the teacher :p
  • And it can also do origami quite well, if you're into origami.
view more: next ›