Libb

joined 2 years ago
[–] Libb@jlai.lu 9 points 1 month ago

a “symptom” of a larger erosion of trust between the United States and Europe.

Erosion?That's no erosion, which would be a slow natural process.

What happened is that Trump, in his usual delicate manner, put a bullet in the head of the US alliance with the EU.

And then, even it's not been officially acted yet, they also put a bullet in the head of NATO too. One just need to listen to mr Vance first Munich speech as vice-president. Sure, unlike his boss, mr Vance is not an illiterate pig, quite the contrary he is one of the smartest and brightest politician I can think of, but the message was still crystal clear: we the EU are on our own.

And then, seeing how Trump is willing to use 'his' economical power and 'his' armed forces to play bully against any country he disagrees with or that doesn't play along the US rules or doesn't pay the USA enough for his 'protection' (like some shitty gangster racketing local shop owners, in an Hollywood movie), I have little doubt what the USA would be willing to do to the EU (and to its too many rules and regulations) if they were given the opportunity. POTUS himself explained to the world we Europeans only exist to "screw America".

If that doesn't say it all about the state of any alliance between us I don't know what will.

And that's not just Trump being Trump. I mean, US people elected this clown twice meaning that's the kind of leadership they want to follow. Why keep on pretending the dude is merely an accident and that thing will get back to 'normal' after him? Normality is Trump-like. When mr Vance will become the next President he will obviously be (a lot) less illiterate and (a lot) less dumb than Trump is, but he certainly will not make us an ally again. They don't give a crap, that's their policy.

It's rarely a good idea to elect an hateful angry monkey as a leader, we can all agree on that but can we also all agree that the issue is never the monkey itself but the people deciding to put it in charge. And those people,they don't seem to me that much willing to change for the better, I'm afraid. Hate and violence seem to be the only plate on their menu, it's just the color of the name on the menu that's different.

The USA has made quite a few dumb decisions since the collapse of the Soviet Union. Decisions that mostly managed to strengthen their true enemies and rivals while weakening their rare real allies. This is just one more decision like that, but a huge one.

[–] Libb@jlai.lu 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I’ve known Lemmy for a few hours and I feel like I’m back in the early spirit of the internet.

Welcome :)

It’s a bit of a digital version of rural exodus. And since 2017/2018, I’ve noticed that everything that, in my opinion, represented the internet has disappeared.

This a very interesting metaphor, real spot on.

But I would say a lot of that rural Internet has not disappeared, not yet. It's still there, very much alive. People are simply not visiting it anymore. They don't dare go outside the pretty walled-gardens they're used to.

But those people wanting to stay parked in their corporate-owned gardens, or silos, doesn't make that small and more humane web go away. And would they chose to, they could still come visit it freely, they could still easily interact with their creators. They could even create and tend to their very own part of it, making that small Web a richer place.

They just don't do it. Most of the time because they can't be bothered with doing the actual work, or because they're afraid to try and to fail. They want to be fed easy to eat content, not learn to cook it themselves.

They want the a Web that is like those shitty fast-food serving standardized and over-processed industrial food. Something ready to eat that is barely food at all but that will stuff their belly and, more importantly, that will never surprise them. Alas, this food is as much a poison for their head as it is for their body. They will realize that too late. It probably already is.

Too bad, because the alternative is still a thing, not that far away.

The small web is still a thing. Many blogs still exist that only share content their author sincerely care about or is interested in, that are ads and tracking free, that respect their readers... But the majority of people have quit visiting them, they simply don't go outside of, say, YT, X, Facebook, Reddit, Instagram, TikTok or whatever where they can all stay together parked like the cattle they have not yet realized they have become.

Back to your original metaphor. Digital rurality is still there and many could easily own a small part of it and make it exwactly like they want it to be, and be happy with it. But they prefer staying in the large over-crowed cities, in small overpriced apartments like most their friends are doing.

Lemmy is a great alternative to reddit but it could relatively easily become another silos—just plural and not corporate-owned but silos nonetheless. It's up to us to keep it open to the alternatives. I mean, sometimes I feel sad to see little posts & comments inviting people to go read/watch something they liked that is not already hosted on some corporate-owned platform. Heck, sharing personal content feels so much like a lost cause to me that I seldom share a link to my own blog posts: why bother? I also publish a lot less often than I used to, here again: why bother?

[–] Libb@jlai.lu 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Ça me rappelle un message ici même, il y a quelques jours où dans les commentaires nous parlions de cartes postales et bien ça pourrait être une raison de plus d'envoyer une carte postale plutôt qu'un SMS: recevoir un joli timbre ;)

La Poste Fr nous en propose toujours de chouettes, enfin je trouve: https://www.laposte.fr/pp/c/beaux-timbres, hésitez pas à partager un lien vers la poste de votre pays ;)

Ca fait plus d'un an que l'idée me trotte en tête du coup j'en profite pour lancer un ballon sonde et voir si ça suscite le moindre intérêt: qui serait intéressé de démarrer un réseau d'échange de cartes postales/lettres 'à l'ancienne'? Aucune idée de comment gérer les questions logistiques et vie privée (ici en France, par exemple à Paris, ouvrir un boite postale c'est pas gagné) mais c'est juste pour savoir si ça vaut la peine de passer du temps sur l'idée, ou pas...

[–] Libb@jlai.lu 8 points 1 month ago

Just read the article, and don’t engage in whataboutery, or in asking questions that distract from the topic.

Thank you for reminding how to not waste my time, really.

[–] Libb@jlai.lu 1 points 1 month ago

The real info would be 721 million divided between 281 researchers (less than 3 million each).

Personally, I'd rather see that nice 700 million budget be used to focus on a handful of selected priority projects (I don't care of they're senior or junior researchers) but that's just me and since I don't have 700 millions I probably do not know what I'm talking about.

Also, being the EU, my very naive idea would then raise the question: what are the selection criteria and who is to decide? And since it's the EU that would lead to the creation of a commission that would study the criteria to use and who to ask, and then to a new commission studying the result of that first commission, and then a new commission deciding of it's worth using those results validated by the first two commissions because of the public perception that day, and so on and, suddenly, we're already 25 years late.

But, I insist, I have no idea what I'm talking about ;)

[–] Libb@jlai.lu 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (3 children)

I hope you won't mind my question.

The main issue with Deepseek is about censorship and privacy as the review suggests.

I don't use AI myself and have not read the article, but isn't there censorship and privacy issue at play also with every single non-Chinese AI out there?

I mean, can I ask one of those non-Chinese AI to make me, say, a pornographic image based on some famous person, or would it refuse? Could I ask a non-Chinese 'how can I make a bomb powerful enough so I can blow This or that (whatever one would not legally own)', or 'How should I mount a coup to take hold of power in my country?' or would it refuse to answer any of that? And then, subsidiary question, would any of these questions be reported to legal authorities?

[–] Libb@jlai.lu 2 points 1 month ago

Using your example, you could be lying.

True that. It's even more interesting considering 'Libb' is not my real name, just the one I fancy using online. But I would say that it's beside the point of your question (which was not about the possibility one would be intentionally telling lies, just how much data makes a 'fact' reliable), still, it's obviously related.

But then... considering that for some undisclosed reason you could not get access to more (source of) info, how would you decide if I say the truth about my name or not, when at the same time next to me some people (more than one) are claiming I'm a liar and that my name is Gertrude? Maybe that can't be decided? Or that should not be? Or mayb the dude claiming his name should be given some extra credit? Or maybe not (I may say I'm but I doubt Elon Musk will admit I'm his natural son and that I should therefore be entitled to a part of his huge piles of money, plus change for the trauma I endured ;)

[–] Libb@jlai.lu 1 points 1 month ago

If I was to consider myself dependent to anything, I would say I'm more of an analog dependency kind of guy than a digital one.

I mean, I have a computer and a phone (and a tablet) and I know how to use them, but I also don't feel much excitement building up thinking about using them, at all. On the other hand, I enjoy doing analog and IRL activities.

[–] Libb@jlai.lu 1 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I keep hearing “it isn’t the quantity…” and I do not understand why it isn’t seen as just as important as trustworthiness of source because even the best source needs a high amount of data to back up a claim.

consider my flat-earthers example: the trustworthiness of the source(s) is at least as important. If I told you my pseudo is 'Libb' you can bet that it is indeed so, even if that just me saying it. And that would remain true if, out of nowhere, 100s of people started telling you my pseudo was in reality 'Mickey' or 'Gertrude'. I would still be Libb. Conclusion? All by myself, against that hypotheticla large crowd, I'm still a more reliable source of info concerning my identity.

On the topic of flat earthers, did you ever see the video of the guy who tried to demonstrate the earth was flat and proved it was round? The look on his face was priceless. haha

No, and I'm almost wishing to see it. Almost.

I must admit the rise of flat earth theory came as a shock to me. I always have had a sweet spot for absurd theories but I could not imagine people taking those seriously. But maybe that's just me being manipulated/lobotomized by the government? As a matter of fact, I'm also a pro-vax and that may explain a lot :p

[–] Libb@jlai.lu 3 points 1 month ago

They licensed a lot of Disney, but Niko and Fantasio, Yoko Tsuno, and Asterix invoke such powerful nostalgia in a way that Disney, being so huge and a current part of the cultural zeitgeist, doesn’t.

So much :)

[–] Libb@jlai.lu 1 points 1 month ago

J'ai aucun souci avec Bitwarden, sauf que j'aime pas le nouveau look, et c'est US et ça, vu leur nouvelle mentalité, qui ne changera parès le rempalcement de Trump, moins je m'y frotte mieux je me porte... Bref, je suis allé lire ton lien (merci :) et le fait que ce soit pas 100% automatisé (qu'il faille appeler le support, en tant que client payant)... c'est pour moi une raison de plus pour que je me mette sérieusement à considérer une alternative.

[–] Libb@jlai.lu 2 points 1 month ago
view more: ‹ prev next ›