Lianodel

joined 2 years ago
[–] Lianodel@ttrpg.network 1 points 3 hours ago

"You are using Bonetti's Defense against me, ah?"

[–] Lianodel@ttrpg.network 1 points 3 hours ago

Boring possibility: the DM thinks halflings and gnomes are largely redundant, and picked one to ban.

Or the one shot involves outsiders getting involved with a halfling community in trouble!

[–] Lianodel@ttrpg.network 1 points 4 hours ago

Kender, who were similar to halflings and I think are now a variant, were notorious for this. Their schtick is that they "borrow" things from their party members, not understanding that it's theft. It gave assholes license to be assholes under the guise of roleplay, until the table inevitably needs a talk.

[–] Lianodel@ttrpg.network 12 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

We are officially thinking about this more than the episode did

[–] Lianodel@ttrpg.network 7 points 1 week ago

If the players are demanding wild results, especially if they're the kind to roll unprompted, then sure.

But in my experience, it's usually just a little flourish or a small bonus, which I think is fine.

And if the issue is that a nat 20 doesn't guarantee success, technically, sure, but I'd be more annoyed being asked to make a pointless roll. I know there are reasons, like a hidden target number, or other characters being able to do it, but in general, I'd rather just hear "no" than go through a pointless check.

[–] Lianodel@ttrpg.network 9 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Let's also throw in being a creep.

He provided a song for the 2001 animated film Osmosis Jones. This is an animated, family-friendly buddy-cop movie about a white blood cell and a cold pill teaming up to take down a virus. In the song, "Cool, Daddy Cool," he explicitly states his attraction to underage girls and his fondness for statutory rape.

Young ladies, young ladies, I like 'em underage see

Some say that's statutory (But I say it's mandatory)

[–] Lianodel@ttrpg.network 10 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Like others have said, the rules are... bad. Especially the latest edition. A couple of the older editions are "favorites," but still mixed bags, and lots of people just take the setting and use it in another system entirely.

There's a Shadowrun actual play podcast called NeoScum that I loved (now concluded), and it began with "It's like D&D mixed with Bladerunner!" and ended with "Fuck this, fuck Shadowrun, the universe rearranges itself so we can play a different game." They even had a goofy recurring bit they would do whenever they had to stop play to look up rules or calculate something, which happened constantly. It's also not a player issue, since they've switched to Call of Cthulhu for another story (Gutter) and just don't have that problem.

[–] Lianodel@ttrpg.network 4 points 1 month ago

Nobody hates Shadowrun more than the people who love Shadowrun. :P

[–] Lianodel@ttrpg.network 6 points 2 months ago

Utilitarianism for people who think the humanities are pointless

[–] Lianodel@ttrpg.network 4 points 2 months ago

I also bounced off of the Reloaded version (and SW in general). Unfortunately, I can't really speak to the alternatives from personal experience.

However, I've been gearing up to try Call of Cthulhu, and found out it has a Western setting! Down Darker Trails. I had never heard about it, but what I could find was really positive. If and when I run a weird west game, that would probably be my first choice, and certainly a top contender.

[–] Lianodel@ttrpg.network 6 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

He never actually apologized. He released a video saying he expressed himself poorly or whatever, then took it down anyway. He never said all the racist points he made were wrong.

[–] Lianodel@ttrpg.network 64 points 3 months ago

Fun fact: a full majority of Supreme Court justices were nominated by presidents who were inaugurated despite losing the popular vote!

 

What makes it your favorite? Do you want to play it? If so, what's keeping you from doing it?

For me, it's Burning Wheel.

I bought it purely based on aesthetics back in 2008ish, then got the supplements, then Gold, then Gold Revised, with the Codex, and the anthology...

I blame it for my weakness for chunky, digest-sized, hardcover RPGs. :P I also like the graphic design, I like the prose (even if it's divisive), and it has both interesting lessons you can plug into other games (like "let it ride," letting success or failure stand instead of making lots of little rolls) and arcane systems that pique my interest (like the Artha cycle, which makes roleplay, metacurrency, skill rolls, and advancement all intersect). I genuinely like reading it for its own sake.

I haven't played it because... well, since it's not D&D, that immediately makes it harder to get people interested, sadly. It's also a bit daunting, given its reputation as a crunchy system. But I have a group of players interested in trying new things, and fewer other games calling for my attention, so hopefully I'll get a chance soon. :)

view more: next ›