LeninOnAPrayer

joined 5 months ago
[–] LeninOnAPrayer@lemm.ee -1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Yeah, you're just justifying serving a terrorist organization. These same things could be said of people that join ISIS if you wanted to make excuses. And those people have much more dire circumstances than anyone that lives in the US ever could.

I'm sure you'd have this same moral gray area discussion when ISIS kills innocent people. /s

Just because someone can click a button on a controller or do paper pushing for a terrorist organization doesn't mean they are any less of terrorist.

I'm sure you'd make the same moral gray argument for the person that booked the tickets for flight 93. They were clearly just doing paperwork.

[–] LeninOnAPrayer@lemm.ee -2 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I guess the only people in poverty are in the west. I guess all the people in the poorest countries in the world are ok with getting bombed for decades so we can have a jobs program.

We can have a jobs program without bombing poor and impoverished countries mate.

The irony of saying I'm disconnected from poverty. I'm literally advocating to stop murdering the poorest countries and people on our planet.

[–] LeninOnAPrayer@lemm.ee 0 points 1 month ago (4 children)

I'm not attacking people that join. I'm critizing people that have joined, served, and still advocate for it because it "pays for college". Like, serving a military that causes the deaths countless innocents and disrupts the stability of entire nations is somehow ok because of that?

No. I respect those that served, learned, and advocate against it wholeheartedly.

[–] LeninOnAPrayer@lemm.ee 0 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Tell me which part of this makes what I said incorrect? You're just describing the material conditions that lead to working class people joining the military. Which I don't disagree with. They are parasitic in nature. I don't blame anyone that was fooled or forced into it by default.

I'm talking about the material outcomes and purpose our military serves. The military being a government jobs program doesn't somehow change its purpose and who it serves.

You could have a Orphan Baby Murdering Factory that provided jobs and benefits. It could even sometimes build infrastructure or help it's community outside of its main purpose. But it would still have a purpose to murder orphan babies.

Our militarys main purpose is to uphold and defend American imperialism. It is the world's largest terrorist organization.

I'll back that up with receipts too if you want. But I really am just trying to get you to understand that this isn't an attack on individuals in the military. But more of an attack on their delusions of what purpose they think it serves.

I respect wholeheartedly those that joined, served, and are now outspoken against it. But I cannot respect for a second someone that served in the military and also advocates for others to do so. Because all they are saying is "well, it's ok to bomb innocent people and disrupt entire countries because otherwise I couldn't have afforded college". It's inherently selfish and quite frankly it's disgusting.

[–] LeninOnAPrayer@lemm.ee 6 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Nah. Zionist have always been fascist. A switcheroo would imply this abomination of a state is any representation of what Judaism is and was prior to Zionism.

It's a fascist cult, that has unfortunately hit the point that many religions have in the past, and overtaken what culture and religion once were for many Jewish people. Making the core of their identity having nothing to do with their ethnicity or religion but more to do with western white supremacy than anything else.

So, not really a switch, just an evolution of western supremacy that has mutated to its currently acceptable form of oppression.

It's also important to remember that the vast vast majority of Zionist are not even Jewish. They are evangelical Christians that have found a minority group acceptable enough to use as a shield for their hatred of Arabs and Muslims.

[–] LeninOnAPrayer@lemm.ee 9 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Nazis. But this time we get shitty songs from them filmed on a smartphone.

[–] LeninOnAPrayer@lemm.ee 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

"Move ice! Get out the way! Get out the way ice, get out the way!"

The "move" part hits pretty hard when you got thousands of people hitting it together. That one was my favorite.

[–] LeninOnAPrayer@lemm.ee 27 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Nah see they read thousands of pages in like an hour. That's why. They just don't need to anymore because they're so intelligent and do it the smart way with like models and shit to compress it into a half a page summary that is clearly just as useful.

Seriously, that's what they would say.

They don't actually understand what LLMs do either. They just think people that do are smart so they press buttons and type prompts and think that's as good as the software engineer that actually developed the LLMs.

Seriously. They think they are the same as the people that develop the source code for their webui prompt. And most of society doesn't understand that difference so they get away with it.

It's the equivalent of the dude that trade shitcoins thinking he understands crypto like the guy committing all of the code to actually run it.

(Or worse they clone a repo and follow a tutorial to change a config file and make their own shitcoins)

I really think some parts of our tech world need to be made LESS user friendly. Not more.

[–] LeninOnAPrayer@lemm.ee 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Just more ahistorical garbage from someone that admittedly doesn't read anything that might not agree with their existing beliefs. You're embarrassing yourself with every reply mate. Now I'm just entertained.

"Each and every time". Cope more mate. You just generalized so much history into a single sentence it's embarrassing.

Yeah it's just the damn MLs getting in the way. You really are just a lib. Or I'm being very generous you fall for liberal talking points.

No respectable anarchist outside of the western world would ever agree with you. You're just repeating garbage liberal filled anarchist without any real ideas.

view more: ‹ prev next ›