LWD

joined 2 years ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] LWD@lemm.ee 21 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

deleted by creator

[–] LWD@lemm.ee 21 points 1 month ago (8 children)

I see no reason to engage with, or trust anything created by, a bullshit generator. If Digg claims to "care" about the humans, then making the top comment into a brick wall (which has zero accountability) is a funny way of showing it.

But then again, I'm sure their privacy policy also says they care about your privacy.

[–] LWD@lemm.ee 173 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (29 children)

this would-be Reddit competitor, built for the AI era

Oh no...

The founders think that the internet is being flooded with bots and AI agents, which will create demand for online communities like Digg that foster real human connections.

Okay, Digg has my cautious attention...

Beneath posts, Digg is leveraging AI to summarize the article’s content.

And they lost me.

[–] LWD@lemm.ee 10 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (15 children)

deleted by creator

[–] LWD@lemm.ee 10 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

deleted by creator

[–] LWD@lemm.ee 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

deleted by creator

[–] LWD@lemm.ee 7 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

deleted by creator

[–] LWD@lemm.ee 44 points 1 month ago (3 children)

OpenAI has gotten virtually unlimited funding for years. It has first dibs and deep discounts on Microsoft data centers.

And somehow, despite every single trade restriction, multiple random startup companies in China (that don't even know how to secure their own databases) manage to make LLMs that outperform it.

I'm not saying that because Chinese companies are uniquely cool. I'm saying that because this whole AI thing is uniquely stupid.

[–] LWD@lemm.ee 2 points 1 month ago

I figured as much. Even this line...

M1's capabilities are top-tier among open-source models

... is right above a chart that calls it "open-weight".

I dislike the conflation of terms that the OSI has helped legitimize. Up until LLMs, nobody called binary blobs "open-source" just because they were compiled using open-source tooling. That would be ridiculous

[–] LWD@lemm.ee 1 points 1 month ago

I've been able to run distillations of Deepseek R1 up to 70B

Where do you find those?

There is a version of Deepseek R1 "patched" with western values called R1-1776 that will answer topics censored by the Chinese government, however.

Thank you for mentioning this, as I finally confronted my own preconceptions and actually found an article by Perplexity that demonstrated R1 itself has demonstrable pro-China bias.

Although Perplexity's own description should cause anybody who understands the nature of LLMs to pause. They describe it in their header as a

version of the DeepSeek-R1 model that has been post-trained to provide unbiased, accurate, and factual information.

That's a bold (read: bullshit) statement, considering the only altered its biases on China. I wouldn't consider the original model to be unbiased either, but apparently perplexity is giving them a pass on everything else. I guess it's part of the grand corporate lie that claims "AI is unbiased," a delusion that perplexity needs to maintain.

[–] LWD@lemm.ee 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (3 children)

deleted by creator

 

Original post

This action was taken under an unannounced rule that can label and censor criticism of anyone or anything with "FUD."

You'll find it's only used to protect the rich and powerful, though.

Unable to simply delete the post, the moderators scrubbed comments from anyone who named and shamed CEO James Dolan, but allowed his supporters to remain uncensored.

James Dolan is a thin-skinned billionaire crybaby who runs Madison Square Garden like it’s his own little surveillance state. The fact that he's using facial recognition tech to ban people—not for crimes, not for safety concerns—but for criticizing him is some straight-up dictator energy.........This isn’t just petty. It’s dangerous. It’s the kind of fascist-lite garbage we’ve been warning about for years: once the powerful get their hands on surveillance tools, they will abuse them to silence dissent. Dolan just doesn't care who sees it. He’s too arrogant, too insecure, and too rich to be held accountable.

The madison square garden ceo, james dolan, is the biggest thin-skinned pussy I have ever read about. Someone who band an individual due to a critical remark they made and put on a shirt? Pathetic lol.

Criticism of basically anyone rich or powerful was removed.

Criticism of Tucker Carlson was removed.

 

"Age verification" laws are actually "upload your ID or get your face scanned to access every website, ending anonymity and associating your identity with everything you do online" laws and if more people understood that they would not be down for this authoritarian nonsense

 

cross-posted from: https://lemm.ee/post/60174009

 

Heise blacklisted

The post

After Trump's decree: fight for US funding for Tor, F-Droid and Let's Encrypt

Censored, all comments locked.

The removal reason

Site is NOT privacy-friendly since it requires agreeing to allow them to use tracking cookies on end device for personalized add and content. Now blacklisted.  ......... Please use a credible source, and try to link to the original author’s work, not a blog trying to steal their thunder (or clicks).

Why this is bullshit

This is not a normal removal message. Most of this removal reason is from a template, the portion including "Now blacklisted" was manually added and has never been used before.

Heise is based in Germany, where the best privacy laws (the GDPR) are enforced strictly. If this site is blacklisted, then any site can be blacklisted.

"Please link to a credible source" is part of the original community rules, and maybe the moderator who edited the message forgot to remove it, because Heise is credible.

US border security questions are suppressed

The post

Traveling into the US with an iphone: question about border security  [question tag] ....... So I've read that you should delete any apps that may have anti-Trump content (social media, WhatsApp, etc.), but even if you factory reset your phone, all the phone messages are still there, right? ........ Is there a way to save text messages in the cloud and have them NOT on your phone (and restore them later)?  ......... Maybe just traveling with a burner phone is the only way.  ......... I just saw two stories of American citizens being detained at airports and ICE searching their phones for anti-Trump stuff.

Censored, all comments locked.

The removal reason

Your submission could be seen as being unreliable, and/or spreading FUD concerning our privacy mainstays, or relies on faulty reasoning/sources that are intended to mislead readers. You may find learning how to spot fake news might improve your media diet.

Why it's bullshit

Their post is based on legitimate concerns from legitimate news sites. There is no FUD here, there is no attack on any "privacy mainstay" unless the moderators believe the US surveillance apparatus needs to be protected by them.

And if we needed more evidence the moderators are protecting the DHS, they also removed this comment from the thread's OP:

DHS revokes legal protections for 532,000 Cubans, Haitians, Nicaraguans and Venezuelans: https://www.npr.org/2025/03/22/nx-s1-5337214/dhs-revokes-humanitarian-parole-cubans-haitians-nicaraguans-venezuelans

Bonus: mods censor a guide to safe border crossing

The post

"How to protect your phone and data privacy at the US border," by Johana Bhuiyan, The Guardian - https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2025/mar/26/phone-search-privacy-us-border-immigration .......... To safeguard your phone and data privacy when traveling to the United States, especially if you're a visa or green card holder, prepare for potential device searches by CBP. Decide beforehand if you will comply with a search request, keeping in mind the risks of refusal, such as device confiscation. Turn your phone completely off before entering the United States (to ensure a heightened state of security and to clear the memory) and ensure it requires a strong password for decryption, disabling biometric unlocks. Instead of wiping your phone entirely (which could raise suspicion), selectively delete sensitive data and empty trash folders. Encrypt your device data and consider moving data you don't want searched to a trusted and secure cloud storage, as CBP policy restricts searching online cloud services. Remember that border enforcement can be unpredictable, so these precautions can help minimize risks during inspection.

The removal reason

carrotcypher: Repost as a link post

Why this is bullshit

No rules were broken. Moderator carrotcypher cannot even be assed to fabricate one. (Why not just blacklist The Guardian too?)

 

Original post text

Given the recent detainment of a French person who got detained because he said something bad about the current administration in his WhatsApp messages. It makes me wonder if WhatsApp is truly end to end encrypted as they claimed. How did they even single him out?

As a corollary question, if I were to pass Customs, and if I delete WhatsApp , Reddit etc just before I reach the counter, will they be able to find out that I just deleted the apps minutes ago? I’ll be deleting them from my phone but keep them on the cloud.

 

It looks like the Privacy Act might be a way to audit DOGE on a per-person level. Jamie Raskin has suggested mailing them a formal request for your data.

While there does appear to be precedent for this, I can't find much more information about it. So this is more of a thread in search of info.

Here is some from NPR:

The Privacy Act was once a quite sleepy law in my privacy classes. It's gotten increasing prominence in part because there's been so much compliance with the Privacy Act. You know, every agency now has to put out, you know, notices about having new collections of information in databases. And there's chief privacy officers at every agency. You have to pay attention to it and adhere to its commitments, which are to ensure that you don't collect information you shouldn't be collecting for a proper purpose, and that you're not sharing it unless you meet the conditions of the Privacy Act.

 

The IRS rules governing nonprofits still required the Mozilla Foundation to beg big to go big: the parent had to go find big grants from Soros, Ford, Knight, MacArthur, and give smaller grants to many. This put it in the lefties-only-no-righty-Irish-need-apply revolving-door personnel sector of NGOs and nonprofits (too many glowies there for me, too). Which meant I had a hostile MoFo over my head the minute I got CEO appointment from the MoCo board...

Of course I can't comment on anything about my exit, for reasons that only the most loopy HN h8ers still can't figure out.

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43251203

 

Context

Senate Bill (SB) 1047 is legislation proposed by Senator Scott Wiener for regulating AI models that cost over $100 million to train. The bill was designed to hold AI companies accountable for potential damages caused by their models.

It gained widespread support from the population of California and a broad coalition of labor unions, AI safety advocates, Hollywood figures, and current and ex-employees of AI megacorporations.

However, many giant corporations including Google, Amazon, Meta, and OpenAI opposed the bill, asking Gavin Newsom to veto it.

Mozilla's statement

On August 29, Mozilla joined the corporations to endorse a veto, publishing its own statement:

Mozilla is a champion for both openness and trustworthiness in AI, and we are deeply concerned that SB 1047 would imperil both of those objectives. For over 25 years, Mozilla has fought Big Tech to make the Internet better, creating an open source browser that challenged incumbents and raised the bar on privacy, security, and functionality for everyone in line with our manifesto.

Today, we see parallels to the early Internet in the AI ecosystem, which has also become increasingly closed and consolidated in the hands of a few large, tech companies. >We are concerned that SB 1047 would further this trend, harming the open-source community and making AI less safe — not more.

Mozilla has engaged with Senator Wiener's team on the legislation; we appreciate the Senator’s collaboration, along with many of the positive changes made throughout the legislative process. However, we continue to be concerned about key provisions likely to have serious repercussions. For instance, provisions like those that grant the Board of Frontier Models oversight of computing thresholds without statutory requirements for updating thresholds as AI proves safe will likely harm the open-source AI community and the startups, small businesses, researchers, and academic communities that utilize open-source AI.

As the bill heads to the Governor’s desk, we ask that Governor Newsom consider the serious harm this bill may do to the open source ecosystem and pursue alternatives that address concrete AI risks to ensure a better AI future for all.

Source: Mozilla (PDF).

Gavin Newsom vetoed this bill on September 29th.

view more: ‹ prev next ›