Krukenberg

joined 11 months ago
[–] Krukenberg@lemmy.world 20 points 1 month ago (3 children)

They could have used Google translate for these short last minute additions, and not a single fuck would probably notice. I hate this stupid overconfidence in AI.

[–] Krukenberg@lemmy.world 14 points 3 months ago (1 children)

VIM..? Safe..?!

[–] Krukenberg@lemmy.world 19 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Acktually – IgE(/antibodies) are bound to the surface of mast cells. Antigens/allergens bind to the IgE receptor and actives the mast cell, releasing histamines. Allergy can actually be treated with anti-IgE (monoclonal) antibodies (Omalizumab)!

[–] Krukenberg@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Flight crew are seated next to emergency exits during landing, they would occupy all crew seats except for any in a crew rest area (which is reached by ladder).

It's a dead body, it won't harass you. They might get rigor mortis but decomposition won't have time to start. Passengers comfort is last priority while balancing a metal tube going 900 km/h though the stratosphere. Some compensation can be arranged when back on the ground.

[–] Krukenberg@lemmy.world 7 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

I don't hade to look to other countries, Swedens track record for enacting this kind of legislation is quite bad. But the process is still transparent and even if new legislation pass it won't come into effect immediately. So taking actions at this stage is premature imo.

[–] Krukenberg@lemmy.world 13 points 5 months ago (3 children)

The government is preparing legislation, Parliament has yet to decide on it.

[–] Krukenberg@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago (3 children)

Cause flight crew are seated next to emergency exits for a reason. Safety > inconvenience

[–] Krukenberg@lemmy.world 5 points 5 months ago (1 children)

That depends on the aircaft. It's very accessible on the ART42/72.

[–] Krukenberg@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

There is no precedent, 'all the means' could also be French nuclear weapons.

[–] Krukenberg@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago

I would hope teslas to have cameras in more than one direction, but maybe that was a too generous assumption.

[–] Krukenberg@lemmy.world 17 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Reason 1: humans can blink – a dirty camera can not.

view more: next ›