Krause

joined 2 years ago
[–] Krause@lemmygrad.ml -4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Taiwan does not need to be named any more than any other province does, it is just part of China.

UNGAR 2758 made the PRC the representative of CHINA, in which Taiwan was already a province of.

[–] Krause@lemmygrad.ml -3 points 2 years ago (3 children)

It's not just the PRC's constitution though, it was decided by UNGAR 2758 that the People's Republic of China represents "China", which includes the Taiwan Province inside it's territory.

https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/192054

[–] Krause@lemmygrad.ml -4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (5 children)

That UN vote is not about Taiwan being a part of PRC, it’s about who represents ‘China’ in the UN.

Exactly, and the Taiwan Province is a part of CHINA, which is represented by the government in Beijing (PRC), before UNGAR 2758 it was represented by the government in Taipei (ROC).

"Taiwan" is not a country, regardless of one's position on this they are either a province of the People's Republic of China or of the Republic of China.

[–] Krause@lemmygrad.ml -2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (7 children)

Military exercises on their own territory as recognized by the United Nations and almost every single country on Earth? What is the issue here?

The Taiwan Province is an inalienable part of the People's Republic of China:

And this is recognized by the United Nations ever since 1971 after UNGAR 2758.

Source, page 546: https://web.archive.org/web/20230503050030/https://legal.un.org/unjuridicalyearbook/pdfs/english/volumes/2010.pdf

Video of the votes happening: https://invidious.projectsegfau.lt/watch?v=sfOIEjuXFyU

[–] Krause@lemmygrad.ml 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Microsoft... Threat Analysis Center??

Since when does Microsoft cover geopolitics? Why is the software/video game company talking about coups in Africa?

[–] Krause@lemmygrad.ml 140 points 2 years ago (1 children)

BURNING MAN IS JUCHE GANG?? 😳

[–] Krause@lemmygrad.ml 20 points 2 years ago (2 children)
[–] Krause@lemmygrad.ml 36 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] Krause@lemmygrad.ml 28 points 2 years ago

I agree 100% with this comment

I can’t believe people here support the genocide and imperialism Ukraine is doing to the people in the Donbass just because it isn’t America

[–] Krause@lemmygrad.ml 75 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (4 children)

yes the tank man at tinyman square from that famous picture got squished like a grape by the tank

https://nitter.cz/fedurante/status/1533099332496502786

[–] Krause@lemmygrad.ml 15 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)
[–] Krause@lemmygrad.ml 13 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Who are “the fucking Nazis” in your comment?

Probably the Ukrainian government:

https://sendvid.com/4ic7j0d7

https://sendvid.com/ajmngmvb

1
💪🇰🇵 (files.catbox.moe)
 
 

some-controversy

 

 
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmygrad.ml/post/843485

The Chinese spy balloon that was shot down over the Atlantic Ocean in early February was built -- at least partly -- using American off-the-shelf parts, a U.S. official has confirmed to ABC News.

A second U.S. official was also able to confirm that the balloon did not appear to have transmitted any of the data it collected on its journey above North America, as was initially reported by the Wall Street Journal.

The first official could not say whether any of the American gear was sold illicitly to China but said determining whether any of it came from illegal trade was a topic of serious concern among officials since some items -- like chips -- are forbidden to sell to certain markets.

 

The Chinese spy balloon that was shot down over the Atlantic Ocean in early February was built -- at least partly -- using American off-the-shelf parts, a U.S. official has confirmed to ABC News.

A second U.S. official was also able to confirm that the balloon did not appear to have transmitted any of the data it collected on its journey above North America, as was initially reported by the Wall Street Journal.

The first official could not say whether any of the American gear was sold illicitly to China but said determining whether any of it came from illegal trade was a topic of serious concern among officials since some items -- like chips -- are forbidden to sell to certain markets.

 

Alternative link if you're not on Lemmygrad: !thedeprogram@lemmit.online

view more: next ›