I find their repeated "I'm not outing anyone", "I'm not here to out anyone" irritating, especially for evading sourcing examples. I guess it's a very evasive, non-confrontational approach. But to me, that's not necessarily a good thing. Either way sourcing isn't likely to resolve the overall systematic (Reddit- and Google-sided) issue anyway.
Kissaki
Of the resulting 122 URLs, 63 have a top comment with a self-promotional affiliate link. Often written months after the original thread was created.
Injecting (posting and manipulating) affiliate links is lucrative for affiliates - Reddit could resolve it by disallowing or automatically clearing affiliate links of links (URL shorteners would be a secondary concern that could be automatically handled too)
Without affiliate spam, it would or could still be lucrative for sellers and product sellers. Which is harder to resolve.
"where required by local law" - on a global platform? How is that supposed to work? When the addresses or being addressed is in such a locality? After complaints only? After prosecution or court orders?
I guess it's more a disclosure of what can happen than it is a terms of use or moderation guideline.
The link offers a download instead of serving an HTML? I'm on mobile Firefox (I doubt it matters).
sued Orange in 2010
14 years. Insane.
Dieser Artikel erwähnt nicht mal, dass die Polizei irgendwelchen Ermittlungen aufgenommen hat
aus dem Artikel:
Die Polizei nahm noch am Abend Ermittlungen auf.
Zur allgemeinen Berichterstattung kann ich keine gute oder allgemeine Einschätzung machen. Ich bin aber skeptisch dass das so allgemein Sinn macht. Dafür ist die Medienlandschaft zu divers.
Für mich steht t-online jetzt so oder so nicht für Qualitätsjournalismus. Und t-online Meldungen möchte ich jetzt auch nicht mit Tagesschau, Spiegel, oder einem Facebook post vergleichen oder gleichsetzen.
I have a prepaid plan that I never change. It costs nothing per month and I get 10 MB inclusive. I only add internet volume bundles when I need it for navigation for longer trips - to ensure it does not exceed that price (gets slower after).
Multiple hundreds is considerable to me and beyond "hobby". It doesn't have to be a full time job or fairly compensated to be more than a hobby.
1.5 k has to be considered in my eyes. It's not negligible or marginal as donations. (Note I labeled donations considerable, not their income - which I don't know. My point was that it's worth mentioning.)
Even though the Commission has fined the company concerned, damages may be awarded by national courts without being reduced on account of the Commission fine.
So if/after Apple's appeal is declined, Spotify - the driving force of this EU investigation - can sue Apple for damages with additional cost to Apple.
Under the App Store’s reader rule, Spotify can also include a link in their app to a webpage where users can create or manage an account.
Instead, Spotify wants to bend the rules in their favor by embedding subscription prices in their app without using the App Store’s In-App Purchase system.
I'm confused now. What is a "reader app"?
Spotify wants to make subscriptions an app functionality and Apple restricts that to it's own payment system - and the alternative they provide is external websites?
Why the heck is it called a "reader rule" and "reader app"?
Weil die Landwirte das Hindernis aber in der Dunkelheit gar nicht abgesichert hätten, seien gleich mehrere Autos am Abend in den Misthaufen gefahren und hätten teils schwere Blechschäden davongetragen, so der Reporter. Drei Verletzte wurden mit leichten Verletzungen ins Krankenhaus gebracht. Die Polizei nahm noch am Abend Ermittlungen auf.
Das ist schon (in Kauf nehmen von) Gefährdung. Bei Protest und Blockade wäre das Hindernis zumindest gekennzeichnet.
Das Deutsche Bahn Konstrukt als Aktiengesellschaft mit Bezuschussung ist ja schon irgendwie absurd. Und dass sich das Verkehrsministerium nicht zu kümmern scheint, fragwürdig wenn es um öffentliche Verkehrsinfrastruktur geht.