Kirk

joined 1 year ago
[–] Kirk@startrek.website 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

...this you?

What does “forced inclusion” mean? What makes it different from regular inclusion?

[–] Kirk@startrek.website 3 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Your examples provided made no mention of "forced inclusion" or what makes it different from regular inclusion.

[–] Kirk@startrek.website 3 points 1 week ago (6 children)

Your two examples didn’t explain what “forced inclusion” means and what makes it different from regular inclusion.

[–] Kirk@startrek.website 5 points 1 week ago

It is exactly that. Same with the meltdowns over Adira.

[–] Kirk@startrek.website 3 points 1 week ago (8 children)

Your explanation didn't explain what "forced inclusion" means and what makes it different from regular inclusion. Maybe you could give an example of each from Star Trek?

[–] Kirk@startrek.website 3 points 1 week ago

For instance, the script may be as blunt as a character saying “Wow, I can’t believe you made it this far despite being a [marginalized out-group]

Ok makes sense but did SFA do that? If so, when?

[–] Kirk@startrek.website 1 points 1 week ago

This is cool, so I could theoretically just set up a Plex/Jellyfin library and not need a youtube account?

[–] Kirk@startrek.website 4 points 1 week ago (12 children)

yeah sure so im curious to know what "forced inclusion" means and how we're supposed to tell it apart from regular inclusion.

[–] Kirk@startrek.website 4 points 1 week ago (14 children)

I saw that but I didn't see anything about what makes inclusion "forced" in one series but not in another.

[–] Kirk@startrek.website 1 points 1 week ago

Uhh Kirk and Uhura were most definitely not in a relationship, they were forced to kiss against their will.

[–] Kirk@startrek.website 2 points 1 week ago

Lol "muddy" about sums it up

[–] Kirk@startrek.website 9 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (16 children)

That's a lot of words to not provide a single example from a show of what makes "forced inclusion" different than "inclusion"

EDIT: Before anyone bothers clicking through the replies, he never actually explains himself or why he's parroting a common right wing buzz-phrase to discourage the presence of minorities in media.

 

Will LineageOS, Graphene and /e/OS be affected by Google's changes to prevent sideloading? Is UbuntuTouch or Sailfish OS promising in the long term?

I understand that right now we are in a bad place, but in your opinion, what OS do you think people who care about freedom should rally around?

 

Not my OC I brazenly stole from @moregaghplease@startrek.website on reddit

 

Yes I know I'm behind everyone else!

First the away team spends a long time debating if they should proceed or... step outside for five seconds to call the ship. They ultimately decide that stepping outside for five seconds is not feasible.

But then literally one minute later Ensign Gamble is somehow beamed up. Presumably they must have called the ship to do this? Did they just... leave out the part about the (now obvious and real) danger? Was there a scene where Pike said "ok yeah his eyes are gone but you can keep going"?

Then later in the episode the away team spends a long time talking about trust and friendship while debating if they should walk on an invisible walkway instead of just like, I don't know, tapping it lightly with their toe or throwing a pebble on it first?

The Ensign Gamble B-plot was good and freaky and featured some great acting by everyone involved. But the A plot felt like it was vibe-scripted! I love SNW but come on.

 
 

FTA:

The last full version of the webpage, archived by the Internet Archive on July 17, still included the now-deleted sections. Parts of Section 8 of Article I, as well as all of Sections 9 and 10 of Article I are now gone from the live site. The deletions, as of August 6, are also archived here. The change was spotted by users on Lemmy, an open-source aggregation platform and forum.

view more: ‹ prev next ›