I am loathe to defend her, but she's actually remained pretty ideologically consistent (terrible but consistent) in her brief political career. She came into office with Qanon beliefs and wanting the Epstein Files to be released and anti vax nonsense and now she no longer is in the Qult but she's still talking about the same things.
Kirk
joined 1 year ago
Yeah (I can't believe I'm saying this) but in Marjorie's defense she described herself as "naive", and that is also the quote the New York Times put in the banner.
It sounds like she is having a literal come to Jesus moment but I also think the readers of the Times are high enough IQ to know that that doesn't erase the past actions.
I expected lols I did not expect to perpetuate a nearly 50 year old debate
This is what's funny to me, "AI" investors must know on some level these products don't actually work the way the companies claim, because if they did they would crash, not help, the economy as it exists now.
Yeah but until two months ago Spotify was 24kbps
fake news
I wonder why Spotify and not YouTube Music, Tidal or Apple Music all of which are higher quality.
um do you really believe that performance stages are constructed to ignore whatever is on them
If sexy romulan is ridiculous I don't want to be normal
Ha! Yes so true.
Yeah that's probably the simplest way!
The NYT piece did not call her savvy. The author did say "shrewd".