Kichae

joined 2 years ago
[–] Kichae@lemmy.ca 18 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Imagine your essential services are all run for profit, by entities with the goal of maximizing profits and minimizing service.

[–] Kichae@lemmy.ca 6 points 9 months ago (2 children)

They're always welcome to get a regular job. They're not choosing what they have to do to survive, they're choosing what they want.

[–] Kichae@lemmy.ca 23 points 9 months ago (7 children)

I can't wait for the future where we're paying subscription fees for a thousand separate essential services and the libertarians start suggestinf thet there should just be a service that provides a single source for paying and managing all of tjose subscriptions.

[–] Kichae@lemmy.ca 8 points 9 months ago

Bye! Enjoy ignoring reality for the rest of your life!

[–] Kichae@lemmy.ca 2 points 9 months ago (2 children)

This is jsut kind of what happens if you dip into random posts on thr global feed. There is a mix of generalist Lemmy sites that expect people to behave like they're on Reddit, and everything's just a free for all, and insular sites that are focused on a narrower community, operating more like independent forums.

Stepping into one of these spaces, and treating it like a big, open one is going to get you tossed on your ass like you're DJ Jazzy Jeff in an Uncle Phil convention.

You need to be aware of what community you are engaging with around here, because it might not want your participation. That is not power tripping, that is just being unwelcoming.

[–] Kichae@lemmy.ca 2 points 9 months ago (2 children)

"apartments built by thr public or coops" is right there. Don't look at a package proposal and treat each part of it as unrelated or judge it in a vacuum.

[–] Kichae@lemmy.ca 5 points 9 months ago (4 children)

And what, exactly, are the long-term problems? The most common one I've seen sited is that they don't maintain properties, but there are solutions to that. Economists just don't seem to be willing to discuss anything that isn't some kind of private market solution.

"We can't do anything that reduces landlord or developer profits" is trying to solve the problem with both hands tied behind your back and a ball gag firmly in place.

[–] Kichae@lemmy.ca 15 points 9 months ago

Oh no. I don't be needin' no internet enabled legislation! Good, old fahsioned, airgapped legislation was good enough before, and it's good enough today!

[–] Kichae@lemmy.ca 10 points 9 months ago (3 children)

This doesn't sound like you're trying to thoughtfully engage with any community on the network, and are, instead, wanting to mindlessly optimize the reach| ofr whatever it is you're trying to slap your user name on.

My thoughts are, decide who you're engaging with first, and treat each Lemmy community as a community, not an audience.

[–] Kichae@lemmy.ca 46 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Has an MBA ever contributed anything of value?

[–] Kichae@lemmy.ca 13 points 9 months ago (3 children)

Now, include the environmental costs of some of these tools, and whether they're a) running at a loss or not in order to gain market share, and b) whether they're the tools people are even using.

Do we still come out ahead? Are the minutes saved - if there are truly any - actually saved, or just shoveled onto someone else's plate as environmental damage?

What's the big picture here? Because society honestly should not give a flying fuck if your job becomes slightly easier at the cost of everybody else.

[–] Kichae@lemmy.ca 2 points 9 months ago

The ruling class, against whom the internet was a critical tool in the name of democracy, decided they were not going to let us have that tool anymore.

view more: ‹ prev next ›